≡ Menu

The Wreck and the Raft by John Fowles

11 Humanity on its raft. The raft on the endless ocean. From his present dissatisfaction man reasons that there was some catastrophic wreck in the past, before which he was happy; some golden age, some Garden of Eden. He also reasons that somewhere ahead lies a promised land, a land without conflict. Meanwhile, he is miserably en passage; this myth lies deeper than religious faith.

12 Seven men inhabit the raft. The pessimist, for whom the good things of life are no more than lures to prolong suffering; the egocentric, whose motto is Carpe diem – enjoy today – and who does his best to get the most comfortable part of the raft for himself; the optimist, always scanning the horizon for the promised land; the observer, who finds it enough to write the logbook of the voyage and to note down the behaviour of the sea, the raft and his fellow-victims; the altruist, who finds his reason for being in the need to deny himself and to help others; the stoic, who believes in nothing but his own refusal to jump overboard and end it all; and finally the child, the one born, as some with perfect pitch, with perfect ignorance – the pitifully ubiquitous child, who believes that all will be explained in the end, the nightmare fade and the green shore rise.

13 But there was no wreck; there will be no promised land. If there ever were an ideal promised land, a Canaan, it would be uninhabitable to humans.

14 Man is a seeker of the agent. We seek an agent for this being in a blind wind, this being on a raft; the mysterious power, the causator, the god, the face behind the mysterious mask of being and not being. Some make an active god of their own better natures; a benevolent father, a gentle mother, a wise brother, a charming sister. Some make an active god from attributes: such desirable human attributes as mercy, concern and justice. Some make an active god of their own worse natures; a god who is sadistically cruel or profoundly absurd; a god who absconds; a black exploiter of the defenceless individual; the venomous tyrant of Genesis 3:16-17.

15 Between these tribes, the firm believers in an active good god and the firm believers in an active bad one, the great majority shift and surge, a milling herd caught between Pangloss and Job. They pay lip service to an empty image; or believe in nothing. In this century they have drifted towards Job. If there is an active good god he has, since 1914, paid very poor wages.

16 Yet as man sees through one reason for living, another well from the mysterious spring. It must be so, because he continues to exist. This inexplicable buoyancy irritates him. He exists, but he is abused.

17 Man is an everlack, an infinite withoutness, afloat on an apparently endless ocean of apparently endless indifference to individual things. Obscurely he sees catastrophes happening to other rafts, rafts that are too distant for him to determine whether they have other humans aboard, but too numerous and too identical for him to presume that they have not.

18 He lives in a survived yet always uncertainly surviving world. All that is has survived where it might not have survived. Every world is and will always be a Noah’s ark.

19 The old myth that his raft, his world, is especially favored and protected now seems ridiculous. He has seen and understood the message from the distant supernovae; he knows the sun is growing larger and hotter and that his world will one day be a white-hot ball in a sea of flames, and he knows that the hydrogen bomb of the sun may burn up an already dead planet. There are other hydrogen bombs waiting and closer at hand. Inwards and outwards the prospect before him is terrifying.

THE NECESSITY OF HAZARD

20 But mankind is in the best of all possible situations for mankind. It may not be the best possible for you or for me, for this or that individual; for this or that age; for this or that world.

21 It is the best possible for us because it is an infinite situation of finite hazard: that is, its fundamental principle will always be hazard, but a hazard within bounds. A hazard without bounds would be a universe without physical laws: that is, a perpetual and total chaos.

22 A god who revealed his will, who ‘heard’ us, who answered our prayers, who was propitiable, the kind of god simple people like to imagine would be desirable: such a god would destroy all our hazard, all our purpose and all our happiness.

23 Hazard has conditioned us to live in hazard. All our pleasures are dependent on it. Even though I arrange for a pleasure, and look forward to it, my eventual enjoyment of it is still a matter of hazard. Wherever time passes, there is hazard. You may die before you turn the next page.

24 I am is I was not, I might not have been, I may not be, I shall not be.

25 In order that we should have meaning, purpose and pleasure it has been, is, and always will be necessary that we live in a whole that is indifferent to every individual thing in it; and the precise form of its indifference is that the duration of being and the fortune during being of each individual thing are fundamentally but not unconditionally in hazard.

26 What we call suffering, death, disaster, misfortune, tragedy, we should call the price of freedom. The only alternative to this suffering freedom is an unsuffering unfreedom.

THE GODGAME

27 Imagine yourself a god, and lay down the laws of a universe. You then find yourself in the Divine Predicament: good governors must govern all equally, and all fairly. But no act of government can be fair to all, in all their different situations, except one.

28 The Divine Solution is to govern by not governing in any sense that the governed can call being governed; that is, to constitute a situation in which the governed must govern themselves.

29 If there had been a creator, his second act would have been to disappear.

30 Put dice on the table and leave the room; but make it seem possible to the players that you were never in the room.

31 The good human and so the good universal upbringing gives freedom to develop, or hazard, within fixed bounds.

32 The whole is not a pharaonic cosmos; a blind obsession with pyramids, assembling, slaves. Our pyramid has no apex; it is not a pyramid. We are not slaves who will never see the summit, because there is no summit. Life may be less imperfect in a hundred years’ time than it is today; but it will be even less imperfect a hundred years after that. Perfectibility is meaningless because wherever we enter the infinite processus we can look forward with a kind of nostalgia for the future, and imagine a better age. It is also evil, because a terminus of perfection breeds a cancer of now. For perfectibilitarians, perfect ends tomorrow justify very imperfect means today.

33 We build towards nothing; we build.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Howard Nelson September 18, 2018, 3:48 PM

    We were born to yearn and strive and earn
    and we thereby earn the right
    to yearn and earn again.

  • ignore amos September 19, 2018, 12:10 AM

    The Wreck of the Medusa. A ghastly but true story of politics, government incompetence, and the elites indifference to the common man’s plight in a disaster.

  • Ken September 19, 2018, 4:51 AM

    Very interesting. Where did the commentary come from? Enjoy your blog immensely. Read it every day. Thanks!

  • Phillipa Crawford September 19, 2018, 6:06 AM

    Reading 11 through 33 makes me itch to read One through 10.

  • Kevin Dickson September 19, 2018, 7:03 AM

    Another great essay. Thanks for educating a knucklehead from South Texas.

  • Tom Hyland August 10, 2020, 3:49 PM

    Here’s a list for you that will blow your mind. A woman named Jennifer Turner reads part of a list of tactics that was once read on the floor of Congress back in 1963. Cleon Skousen (1913-2006) wrote a book titled “The Naked Communist” and several items on Jennifer’s list are from this book. The familiarity of these schemes are exactly what is occurring on the streets, in cultural and educational institutions, and is being endorsed by politicians everywhere lately. Very creepy stuff. About 11 minutes in length and well worth watching. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBJZkaymVLI

  • joedaddy August 10, 2020, 4:41 PM
  • Annie Rose August 10, 2020, 4:51 PM

    The painter of this work was so taken by the stories of horror surrounding the tragedy, that he put himself in total seclusion to paint it. Having been very familiar with the ravages of the plague and other diseases, he spent much time sketching corpses at the morgue to get the lividity of the skin just right in his work.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Raft_of_the_Medusa
    The painting at the Louvre is hypnotizing, and a fair warning to us about the ego and fragility of man, and what we might contemplate doing just to survive another day.

  • GI-had Joe August 10, 2020, 8:43 PM

    My favorite painting. I have seen it twice in the Louvre and have a print hanging in my office. Always reminded me of the struggle of difficult construction projects. It’s beautiful!

  • hooodathunkit August 10, 2020, 8:53 PM

    for Phillipa, it’s not as interesting as you might have anticipated:
    INTRODUCTION
    1 The book you are about to begin is written in the form of notes. This is not laziness on my part, but an attempt to suppress all rhetoric, all persuasion through style. Many of the notes are dogmatic expressions of opinion; and here, similarly, my intention is not to bludgeon into belief, but to banish all possibility of persuasion by artificial means. I do not want my ideas to be liked merely because they are likeably presented; I want them to be liked in themselves.
    2 This is not a dialogue, but only one side of a dialogue. I state; you, if you wish, refute.
    3 Some of what I say suffers from the usual defect of speculation and generalization; there is no proof. What proof there is lies in your agreement; what disproof, in your disagreement. Many modern philosophers would claim that unverifiable statements are scientifically meaningless; but I cannot agree that philosophy is, or will ever be, only a science.*[2]
    4 I am a poet first; and then a scientist. That is a biographical fact, not a recommendation.
    5 I believe in the essential sanity of man, and what follows is a memorial to that belief.

  • Kevin Shaughan Dickson August 11, 2020, 9:09 AM

    Wreck of the Medusa: The Tragic Story of the Death Raft
    Book by Alexander McKee

    An amazing story and a great read.