« Mr. Gobley on "The Annual Review" | Main | How About Giving the 3rd World a Reverse Copenhagen! »
December 18, 2009
A rocket scientist on "climate science"
The sad fact is the science behind man-made global warming is not good science.
It is rather pathetic actually. I work with premier scientists and in fact review their missions for feasibility to return the results advertised. I would fail this mess without a second thought....
The science of global warming is a mess. They have no error budget that proves they can detect the warming they say they have detected. Their tree data is applied wrong by assuming a temp value when all you can estimate is a range (and tree ring recent divergence with current temps just proves trees are lousy indicators of temperature anyway). The alarmists have made all sorts of bogus and indefensible site adjustments, station combing while regularly making up stations from thin air to alter (or hide) the real temperature record.
Instead of explaining the data, they adjust the data to meet their explanations. The Global Climate research has not made it to a professional level of scientific endeavor as we see in more established areas of science.. If their science was so settled the supporters could answer these challenges without lifting a finger. But they cannot, instead they play PR games and smear their opponents. Houston, they have a problem. -- The Strata-Sphere ｻ How Not To Create A Historic Global Temp Index
Posted by Vanderleun at December 18, 2009 1:48 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.