≡ Menu

The Parable of the White Whale and the Good Ship “America” in 2020

Humanity on its raft. The raft on the endless ocean. From his present dissatisfaction man reasons that there was some catastrophic wreck in the past, before which he was happy; some golden age, some Garden of Eden. He also reasons that somewhere ahead lies a promised land, a land without conflict. Meanwhile, he is miserably en passage; this myth lies deeper than religious faith. — JohnFowles, The Aristos

How fares the good ship America during this, the 244th year of our voyage? Many would say that with its new captain setting a new course it will weather the current tempests and sail on into fairer days and calmer waters. Many others would say that we tack between Scylla and Charybdis with a more than fair chance of being driven onto a lee shore by the gusting headwinds. All would agree our present position was unforeseeable even four years ago and that our present passage is fraught with danger.

Dangerous passages are nothing new to the good ship America. She’s weathered many but never one quite so close run as that of 1860 to 1865 when a fire in American minds burned so hot it required the blood of 620,000 men to quench them. We did not sail into that maelstrom in a year or so. We were bound there, some would say, from the founding.

“Now small fowls flew screaming over the yet yawning gulf; a sullen white surf beat against its steep sides; then all collapsed, and the great shroud of the sea rolled on as it rolled five thousand years ago.”


The Civil War first loomed on the horizon during the rise of Transcendentalism in New England. That period began in the early 19th century and flowered during the literary period of 1850 to 1855 that is known as the American Renaissance. Transcendentalism was the first secular Great Awakening and perhaps its most enduring. Emerson and Thoreau are the chief avatars of the movement as it is known today and much of contemporary American progressivism bears the marks of those two men.

I’m not interested in them at present. Although entrancing to me as a young man, both Emerson and Thoreau have come to seem softer, more soyish, to me of late. Both much-lauded essayists have taken on the consistency of store-bought bread. Instead, I’d like to look at the more rugged work of an outlier of transcendentalism, a prophet who came late to the dance, Herman Melville.

Moby Dick is not only our greatest American novel to date, it is also a vision of our shared fate on this ship of state.

Melville was, unlike many other transcendentalists, the very opposite of an intellectual dilettante. He was an Abraham in a land of Lutherans. Melville was a man with a harsh experience with ships and how they fare upon stormy seas. Melville was a man with rough hands. Melville was a man that, having voyaged further out, did – for a few years at least – see deeper in. And in seeing deeper in and leaving behind a record of that vision in his masterwork, Melville still has something to say to us today about the state of America, the experimental nation.

Long sea voyages have strange effects on writers as the mystical and melancholy work of Conrad shows most clearly. The same effects, at first submerged, were to surface in the work of Melville in one gigantic book and then submerge again raising only ripples on the surface of his subsequent writing. Prophecy is a harsh taskmaster and more often than not consumes the vessels through which it speaks. So it was, in the end, with Melville.

As a young man, Melville stood many long watches on the long nights in the dark oceans in the early 19th century. Decades later, those voyages and night watches would haunt and inspire Melville as he struggled to finish the career-ending vision that had gripped him in transcendentalist New England in 1850. At first, his book was to be just another adventurous sea story like Typee or its sequel Omoo. In this case, however, the destination was not to be the exotic south sea islands, but a whale as big as an island. Indeed, Melville in contemporary correspondence doesn’t refer to his book as Moby Dick but as The Whale. It was only in the last stages that the book’s title became Moby Dick, a variant of a monstrous real whale of the time Mocha Dick, for reasons that Melville never clarified. Perhaps he just liked the sound of it.

Melville’s first books had been successful and, I imagine, at some point Melville thought that The Whale would be as well. It was not to be. In his lifetime the book was to earn him only a bit over $500. Moby Dick was not a formula novel. It was not, as they say in publishing, “the same thing only different” that his readers were expecting. It was just plain different, and therefore unpopular. Although he no doubt intended at the beginning for Moby Dick to be a rousing whale hunt on the high seas ending in tragedy, it seems that at a certain point something else, something other, took over the writing of the book and drove Melville before it. In the process, the book broke him financially, spiritually, and physically. As it was finally written, Moby Dick was to be and become many things, but “commercial” was not among them.

In Melville’s day, stories of long voyages to the far Pacific read like science fiction voyages to distant stars and alien worlds read today. As such, they were much sought after by readers of the time since the novel was the television of the 19th century. His first couple of books about his youthful adventures both exotic and guardedly erotic had enjoyed such large sales he’d be able to move his family to the country to continue to spin his yarns of the far oceans, cannibals, and the hunt for that singular source of light and lubrication in his era, the sperm whale. In the beginning, Moby Dick was just going to be another ripping yarn about adventure in the seas where few men had gone before. But that changed when Melville met Nathanial Hawthorne and began reading a bit too much of the Old Testament.

Hawthorne was an older man when Melville and he first became friends following an enforced conversation in a cave during a surprise thunderstorm. Following that encounter, their friendship grew apace during most of the time that Melville was actively composing the novel but faded soon after for reasons still unclear even though the novel is dedicated to Hawthorne. Perhaps the intense state that Melville had worked himself into proved to be too tiring for Hawthorne. We’ll never know. Still, it is amusing to think of Hawthorne and Melville strolling about the woods near Pittsfield and Lenox, Massachusetts discussing Melville’s latest effort and Hawthorne saying, in an off-hand manner, “You know, Herman, this is a pretty good whaling story you’ve got here, but how about taking one more pass at it and adding a little more, I don’t know, depth and resonance to it?”

At the same time, it’s clear from his letters that Melville was obsessively reading in the Old Testament, with an emphasis on Solomon and the prophets and finding that “Ecclesiastes is the fine hammered steel of woe.” Those resonant jeremiads were clearly having an effect on him along with the pervasive atmosphere of transcendentalism. They were the material he began to bring to his composition and revision of Moby Dick. That and whatever he gleaned from his conversations with Hawthorne, a man celebrated as one of the greatest American writers of his day and who retains that position even into the 21st century.

“It is as an allegory, as a downward trending Pilgrims Progress, that Moby Dick should be read. It is a book that was not so much written as it was received.”

That Moby Dick had gripped Melville past all reason is confirmed in a letter from his wife revealing that he

“wrote White Whale or Moby-Dick under unfavourable circumstances— would sit at his desk all day not writing anything till four or five o’clock—then ride to the village after dark—would be up early and out walking before breakfast—sometimes splitting wood for exercise. Published White Whale in 1851.—Wrote Pierre: published 1852. We all felt anxious about the strain on his health in Spring of 1853.”

This is not the picture of a writer having an easy time of it. It was the struggle with the book that brought out the mystic that was never far beneath the surface in Herman Melville; a mystic that was perhaps first called during the long night watches of his youth. Now as he reached a successful middle age those faint mystical beginnings blended with the “fine hammered steel of Ecclesiastes” and the mystical energy of the New England transcendentalists of the 1850s to suffuse Moby Dick.

Scholars have long noted that the rhythms of Shakespeare in the most transported passages of the novel shape it, but it seems to me that the enduring and strange power of the book comes from someplace deeper than style. The haunting power of the book arises from the deeps of the human soul; from someplace in Melville’s psyche that understood, at some moment, that what he was involved in creating as he composed the novel was not merely another ripping sea yarn of hunting down a source of oil and lubrication for his era, but something that could stand, in time, as it does, for the great ship of state on which he and all other Americans of his time, and ours, crewed into an unknown future.

At some point, Moby Dick turned from yarn to allegory. And it is as an allegory, as a downward trending Pilgrims Progress that Moby Dick should be read. It is a book that is not so much written as it is received.

On a very real level, Melville is taking dictation from something other that is apart from and larger than himself. D. H. Lawrence in his “Classic Studies in American Literature” would probably have that something as “The Spirit of Place,” and to avoid contention I’ll leave it at that.

From fierce Jeremiads flung out of a bow-shaped pulpit, to brief meditations on avatars such as Bulkington, to longer explorations of “The Whiteness of the Whale,” Moby Dick is not only our greatest American novel to date, it is also a vision of our shared fate here on the storm-tossed decks of this ship of state. Moby Dick is the American allegory; our dark Pilgrim’s Progress.

Like all great works, Moby Dick repays re-reading at different stages of life. Its vision of the deeper truths of the American experiment may find a different focus, be different in different passages and chapters at different times, strike deeper chords, but the vision persists. And even if the vision inspires, it still terrifies as one’s reading finds concordant echoes in contemporary events. Like its ostensible subject, Moby Dick is the Leviathan of American allegories. To paraphrase Melville’s contemporary Whitman, “It is vast. It contains multitudes.”

I’ve read Melville’s masterpiece, the composition of which pretty much brought an end to his career as a writer, many times over the years. Of late, I keep returning to a particular chapter as a harbinger of the dangerous shoals and lees on which our ship of state is currently tossed — The Try-Works.

Ostensibly, The Try-Works is about cooking down the carcass of a whale into its oil late at night on the decks of the ill-fated Pequod. But like all things in Moby Dick, that is only the stage set for a more sonorous drama and deeper meditation.

It was about nine o’clock at night that the Pequod’s try-works were first started on this present voyage. It belonged to Stubb to oversee the business.

Stubb is the pipe-smoking and contemplative second mate of the Pequod. He’s not the intellectual that Starbuck is, nor the blunt and uncompromising Flask. Instead, he’s affable enough with a kind of homespun wisdom to him as he moves too and fro wrapped in the constant smudge of his pipe.

“All ready there? Off hatch, then, and start her. You cook, fire the works.”

The works, a kind of vast kettle set over a fire pit, draw their heat from the very beast they are melting to the fluid on which so much in the early 19th century depended. As Melville describes the process,

No wood is used, except as a means of quick ignition to the staple fuel. In a word, after being dried out, the crisp, shriveled blubber, now called scraps or fritters, still contains considerable of its unctuous properties. These fritters feed the flames.

So far, so good and so… prosaic. A straight forward bit of information about how the industry of whaling was carried out. Moby Dick is packed full of these moments and morsels of information about the technology of whaling. But then, as so often happens in the book, a strange kind of vision overcomes Ishmael and we see, with him, deeper into the moment that the mere burning of fat to make a fire.

Like a plethoric burning martyr, or a self-consuming misanthrope, once ignited, the whale supplies his own fuel and burns by his own body. Would that he consumed his own smoke! for his smoke is horrible to inhale, and inhale it you must, and not only that, but you must live in it for the time. It has an unspeakable, wild, Hindoo odor about it, such as may lurk in the vicinity of funereal pyres. It smells like the left wing of the Day of Judgment; it is an argument for the pit.

“An argument for the pit.” Indeed, the smell must have been that and more with its allusion to the burning of corpses on the banks of the Ganges. But it also serves notice that something more is afoot here than a whaling story; something more than some arcane precursor of “The Most Dangerous Catch.” Instead, we understand that a darker dream is about to be unfolded and Melville takes us deeper into that darkness.

The wind was freshening; the wild ocean darkness was intense. But that darkness was licked up by the fierce flames, which at intervals forked forth from the sooty flues, and illuminated every lofty rope in the rigging, as with the famed Greek fire.

And laden with that fire the Pequod, emblem of the society that made and launched her, is seen to drive on,

as if remorselessly commissioned to some vengeful deed.

That deed, as we know from what comes before and after, is the hunting and killing of the White Whale; an act that dooms all aboard except the witness and prophet, the one “escaped to tell thee.” But first, we have to receive a quick sketch of the Pequod’s crew on deck in that flame-slashed night. It’s an assemblage of which the most ardent supporters of diversity today would be proud. For its time, and absent the women, the crew of the Pequod looks like America.

Standing on this were the Tartarean shapes of the pagan harpooners, always the whale-ship’s stokers.

These would be Queequeg, the tattooed South Sea island cannibal (reformed), Tashtego, “an unmixed Indian from Gay Head” on Nantucket, Daggoo, a hulking African from Africa, and Fedallah, a Zoroastrian Parsi from India come to the Pequod by way of China.

These men, having slain the whale they are rendering, are the ones who feed its flesh into the pot and provide the ghastly entertainment for other members of the crew:

Here lounged the watch, when not otherwise employed, looking into the red heat of the fire, till their eyes felt scorched in their heads. Their tawny features, now all begrimed with smoke and sweat, their matted beards, and the contrasting barbaric brilliancy of their teeth, all these were strangely revealed in the capricious emblazonings of the works.

All much like a group of today’s workers might, after a long day, repose in an antediluvian sports bar in the blue glow of a flat-screen and watch some odd iron-man challenge unfold:

The harpooners wildly gesticulated with their huge pronged forks and dippers; as the wind howled on, and the sea leaped, and the ship groaned and dived, and yet steadfastly shot her red hell further and further into the blackness of the sea and the night, and scornfully champed the white bone in her mouth, and viciously spat round her on all sides; then the rushing Pequod, freighted with savages, and laden with fire, and burning a corpse, and plunging into that blackness of darkness, seemed the material counterpart of her monomaniac commander’s soul.

(Headlong rushing. Savages. Fire. A corpse. A monomaniac commander. All these images strike the bell of our present day.)

Or so it seems to Ishmael who has drawn for this shift the task of helmsman; of keeping the ship on her true course. Removed from his fellow seamen to the stern, it is a task that lends itself to drowsiness, to dreams and visions:

So seemed it to me, as I stood at her helm, and for long hours silently guided the way of this fire-ship on the sea. Wrapped, for that interval, in darkness myself, I but the better saw the redness, the madness, the ghastliness of others. The continual sight of the fiend shapes before me, capering half in smoke and half in fire, these at last begat kindred visions in my soul, so soon as I began to yield to that unaccountable drowsiness which ever would come over me at a midnight helm.

And Ishmael, for a fateful moment, drifts until…

Nothing seemed before me but a jet gloom, now and then made ghastly by flashes of redness. Uppermost was the impression, that whatever swift, rushing thing I stood on was not so much bound to any haven ahead as rushing from all havens astern.

But this moment of feeling as if the ship was lost in a headlong dash towards no particular place but only rushing away from all places and havens previously known passes when Ishmael realizes what has happened. In his drifting semi-slumber, Ishmael has merely turned around and is looking at the darkness behind the ship. He comes back to reality not a moment too soon.

In an instant I faced back, just in time to prevent the vessel from flying up into the wind, and very probably capsizing her.

Because of this reprieve, the ship is made safe and able, for a time at least, to continue on as before, “rushing from all havens astern” and “remorselessly commissioned to some vengeful deed.”

This is the nightmare of all those whose time and duty have converged so that they, and not others, are at the helm, charged with the responsibility of keeping the ship on its true course, of keeping it from the lee shore, of steering it ahead towards calmer and sunnier seas and climes. It is a task at which the fire that burns and flares in the minds of men will always seek to distract the helmsmen. It is a distraction all helmsmen must, as Melville saw, guard against and avoid.

Look not too long in the face of the fire, O man! Never dream with thy hand on the helm! Turn not thy back to the compass; accept the first hint of the hitching tiller; believe not the artificial fire, when its redness makes all things look ghastly. To-morrow, in the natural sun, the skies will be bright; those who glared like devils in the forking flames, the morn will show in far other, at least gentler, relief; the glorious, golden, glad sun, the only true lamp – all others but liars!

This approaches the core of Melville’s vision. Only the true light, not the light from the fires, nor the lamps, nor the burning dreams of men is the one to steer by and towards. “All others but liars!”

And not because it is the light that illuminates gentle and fine things only, but because it is the light of the world as it is. Not the Happy World that is always to come and always, strangely, delayed.

Nevertheless the sun hides not Virginia’s Dismal Swamp, nor Rome’s accursed Campagna, nor wide Sahara, nor all the millions of miles of deserts and of griefs beneath the moon. The sun hides not the ocean, which is the dark side of this earth, and which is two thirds of this earth.

Nor is one to believe the men who emerge from the masses preaching Paradise Now, with only a few modern alterations and additions.

So, therefore, that mortal man who hath more of joy than sorrow in him, that mortal man cannot be true – not true, or undeveloped.

Books and philosophies promising serenity and happiness now must also be ignored if the ship is to remain safe,

With books the same. The truest of all men was the Man of Sorrows, and the truest of all books is Solomon’s, and Ecclesiastes is the fine hammered steel of woe. “All is vanity”. ALL.

Not quite ALL as we see in the conclusion of The Try Works as Melville shares the last and possibly greatest insight of his vision and prophecy. Even in the knowledge that “’All is vanity’. ALL,” there remains the one way for the helmsman to steer the ship clear of disaster. He must, in the end, refuse the promise and the seduction of the refining fire, and stay at his station at the helm of the ship.

But even Solomon, he says, “the man that wandereth out of the way of understanding shall remain” (i. e. even while living) “in the congregation of the dead”. Give not thyself up, then, to fire, lest it invert thee, deaden thee; as for the time it did me.

There is a wisdom that is woe; but there is a woe that is madness. And there is a Catskill eagle in some souls that can alike dive down into the blackest gorges, and soar out of them again and become invisible in the sunny spaces. And even if he for ever flies within the gorge, that gorge is in the mountains; so that even in his lowest swoop the mountain eagle is still higher than other birds upon the plain, even though they soar.

And so…. from all of that and so much more besides ….how fares the good ship America during 2022, the 246th year of our voyage?

It is laden with savages,
It is burning with fire,
It is carrying a corpse,
And it is captained by a commander who still seeks MAGA.

Then again, as in the final words of Melville’s vision, even at its lowest swoop America is still “higher than the other birds upon the plain, even though they soar.”

Still soaring. And still, by the grace of God, sailing on.

And still “The America.”

Not yet ‘The Pequod.”

Steady on. Steady on.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • eqzltzrwjm June 25, 2017, 6:00 AM

    The Parable of the White Whale and the Good Ship “America” – American Digest
    eqzltzrwjm http://www.g2xl269g5mi6tu02ft2m197z4j07cl3zs.org/

  • The Parable of the White Whale and the Good Ship “America” – American Digest

  • bob sykes September 18, 2017, 4:44 AM

    Another repost with some additions. I’m not complaining. I enjoyed both the first time and the second time, especially this one.

    As a real pessimist, I have come to think that a quiet coup d’etat has occurred, and that Trump is no longer the actual President but a sock puppet for his coup masters. He has turned his back on just about every one of his campaign promises and his supporters. The Deep State has revealed itself in its hour of desperation.

    But enough of that. Moby Dick is truly a revelatory, elegiac novel.

  • Jayne September 18, 2017, 5:46 AM

    Thought provoking essay. But quite often I fail at unraveling an allegory. The corpse? Our civil society? The US Constitution?

    Interesting observation Bob Sykes, about a coup. Yes. POTUS has failed to keep his word to his supporters. He is tied and bound by the elite of his party, the media and the infernal rulings against him from various federal judges. Is the in addition to the deep state? Or is this the very deep state? And, truly, the man never stood a chance, did he? Still, it is difficult for me to watch him go down rather than stand tall against the ruin and shout stop.

  • Sam L. September 18, 2017, 8:05 AM

    Moby Dick sounds lick a venereal disease.

  • Howard Nelson September 18, 2017, 10:26 AM

    Great read!
    Notify the helmsman that all is well. It’s been ordained that we will always sail on stormy seas, for this is our ever-changing home. Trough and crest test our worst and best. This is the old and everlasting normal — see our 1780’s as noted below.
    “Confidence in government was abysmally low. Since the end of the Revolutionary War in 1783, Congress had struggled to govern, with little actual power and even less respect. …

    Contempt for politicians was rife: a New Englander transplanted to Georgia groaned, ‘The people here are as depraved as they are in Rhode Island, for most of the Offices in the State are filled by the worst characters in it.’ ”

    Many political men held an equally low opinion of the voting public … “The people should have as little to do as may be about the government. They lack information and are constantly liable to be misled.”

    h/t The First Congress, by Ferguson M. Bordewich

    So, after 200+ tumultuous years we are still afloat and on course with freedom filling our sails.
    Cheers, shipmates! Thank God and Man and do what’s worthwhile while you can.

  • Howard Nelson September 18, 2017, 10:36 AM

    Edit please.
    govern in place of government, in 2nd paragraph of my semisermon above
    misled in place of missed at the end of the line above the h/t attribution.

  • Walt Gottesman September 18, 2017, 10:41 AM

    Thanks for this review. Can imagine that Melville himself might have recognized a reflection of his own depth and word-art in your profound post. Have often thought of Moby Dick as ultimately a cautionary tale, a warning about the self-destructive folly of obsessive revenge-seeking. Don’t know if Melville’s magnum opus is an allegory – or a parable – of the course of our American ship of state, but after reading and re-reading this, I can try to understand it as such.

    Haven’t read much of Emerson or of Thoreau. Have read about Walden but stubbornly refused to read the whole thing when it was assigned in my youth. In my 50s though, a couple decades back, I came across a quote by Thoreau about fishing that led me to read its source, an earlier book of his, A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers. That book, an account of a fishing trip he’d taken with his late elder brother John, along with other of his musings, was my introduction to his writings. In it I found evidence that he was neither averse to hard work, nor an atheist, nor anti-Christian. Here are some quotes from that 1849 volume:

    p. 69: “The New Testament is an invaluable book, though I confess to having been slightly prejudiced against it in my very early days by the church and the Sabbath school.”

    p. 97. “Can there be any greater reproach than an idle learning? Learn to split wood, at least. The necessity of labor and conversation with many men and things, to the scholar is rarely well remembered; steady labor with the hands, which engrosses the attention also, is unquestionably the best method of removing palaver and sentimentality out of one’s style, both of speaking and writing.
    He will not idly dance at his work who has wood to cut and cord before nightfall in the short days of winter; but every stroke will be husbanded, and ring soberly through the wood; and so will the strokes of that scholar’s pen, which at evening record the story of the day, ring soberly, yet cheerily, on the ear of the reader, long after the echoes of his ax have died away. The scholar may be sure that he writes the tougher truth for the calluses on his palms. They give firmness to the sentence. Indeed, the mind never makes a great and successful effort, without a corresponding energy of the body.
    …plainness and vigor and sincerity, the ornaments of style, were better learned on the farm and in the workshop than in the schools.”

    p. 98. “From the weak and flimsy periods of the politician and literary man, we are glad to turn even to the description of work, the simple record of the month’s labor in the farmer’s almanac, to restore our tone and spirits. A sentence should read as if its author, had he held a plough instead of a pen, could have drawn a furrow deep and straight to the end.”

    p. 121. “Christianity…is humane, practical and, in a large sense, radical. So many years and ages of the gods those Eastern sages sat contemplating Brahma, uttering in silence the mystic “Om,” being absorbed into the essence of the Supreme Being, never going out of themselves, but subsiding farther and deeper within; so infinitely wise, yet infinitely stagnant; until, at last, in that same Asia, but in the western part of it, appeared a youth, wholly unforetold by them, not being absorbed into Brahm, but bringing Brahm down to earth and to mankind; in whom Brahm had awakened from his long sleep, and exerted himself, and the day began-a new avatar. The Brahman had never thought to be a brother of mankind as well as a child of God. Christ is the prince of Reformers and Radicals. Many expressions in the New Testament come naturally to the lips of all Protestants and it furnishes the most pregnant and practical texts. There is no harmless dreaming, no wise speculation in it, but everywhere a substratum of good sense. It never reflects, but it repents. There is no poetry in it, we may say, nothing regarded in the light of beauty merely, but moral truth is its object. All mortals are convicted by its conscience.”

    p. 122. “The New Testament is remarkable for its pure morality; the best of the Hindu scripture, for its pure intellectuality.”

    Thoreau studied the Classics at Harvard when Harvard still required much of its applicants and entrants. But his father was a pencil maker, not one of the wealthy Boston “Brahmins.” I read that Thoreau invented a process for making more durable pencils by binding the graphite with clay. Can’t quite envision him as one of the modern dwellers-in-parental basements. Can’t help but wonder if Thoreau’s support for Abolitionism was influenced, at least in part, by tales he’d heard of the outright persecution that his French Huguenot ancestors were subjected to by their neighbors of the majority denomination in France.

    Having myself been a nearly impoverished student and a poorly paid teacher, at previous times in my life, I don’t see Thoreau’s (sometimes maligned) trips from Walden into nearby Concord for companionship, food, or to get his laundry done by his mother, as anything hypocritical. He didn’t intend to become a recluse at Walden Pond. He was a tutor, a teacher, a scholar, had once, along with his elder brother John, started an academy. Though eccentric, he was sociable. Anarchists and progressives may claim him as a predecessor but to do that, it seems to me, they have to ignore much about what he had to say and what he did.

    Read an interesting 2015 New Republic article online about Thoreau’s complexities (some of them admirable):
    “Everybody Hates Henry
    Literary saint or arrogant fraud—why do we need Thoreau to be one or the other?”
    By Donovan Hohn October 21, 2015

    Great work you are doing at this site. Thanks for letting me comment.

  • Walt Gottesman September 18, 2017, 10:44 AM

    Sorry for all the italics. Meant them only for book titles.

  • Mark Allinson September 18, 2017, 10:40 PM

    D.H.Lawrence read the novel as an allegory of the decline and fall of the West – idealism seeking to grasp and control the unknowable depths of Being would spell our doom. From the Lawrence’s essay referred to above:

    “The reversion. ‘Not so much bound to any haven ahead, as rushing from all havens astern.’
    That great horror of ours! It is our civilization rushing from all havens astern.
    The last ghastly hunt. The White Whale.
    What then is Moby Dick? He is the deepest blood-being of the white race; he is our deepest blood-nature.
    And he is hunted, hunted, hunted by the maniacal fanaticism of our white mental consciousness. We want to hunt him down. To subject him to our will. And in this maniacal conscious hunt of ourselves we get dark races and pale to help us, red, yellow, and black, east and west, Quaker and fireworshipper, we get them all to help us in this ghastly maniacal hunt which is our doom and our suicide.”

  • Howard Nelson September 20, 2017, 8:30 PM

    It seems the story carries a warning against joining forces with a leader who refuses to accept responsibility for his part in his own physical and mental crippling
    Blaming the innocent whale, whose only desire is to live freely, and seeking misplaced revenge against this now defined malevolent enemy, brings doom to all but two — one to tell the story to the surface inhabitants, and one, the whale, to tell his deep-dwelling species of the danger in surfacing for play or air.
    How to assess psychopathy in our leaders and stupidity and greed in our own risk taking are perennial lessons to be learned. We easily fool ourselves.
    It’s a pity that we don’t run out of others to blame.

  • ghostsniper February 14, 2020, 1:01 PM

    “She’s listing heavily to port and the hull’s been breached, Cap’n! She ca’ take any more!”
    On better views, Nike snapped it off in Avenatti’s long ass and his downward slide accelerates into over drive.

    The 48-year-old attorney was accused in the Nike case of trying to shake down the publicly traded company by threatening to go public with alleged evidence that the company had bribed amateur basketball players and their families unless Nike paid him millions of dollars.
    Avenatti warned Nike’s attorney that the claims could “take ten billion dollars off your client’s” stock market capitalization.
    Avenatti had claimed to represent amateur basketball coach Gary Franklin, who testified at trial that he was unaware of the lawyer’s tactics.
    Prosecutors said Avenatti was motivated by a desperate need to get out from crushing personal debt of more than $11 million.
    “I’m not f —-ing around with this, and I’m not continuing to play games,” Avenatti told Nike’s lawyers, shortly before his arrest last March.
    “You guys know enough now to know you’ve got a serious problem,” he said. “And it’s worth more in exposure to me to just blow the lid on this thing. A few million dollars doesn’t move the needle for me.”

    Nike ate Avenatti’s lunch and laughed in his face, then snatched his ass pocket for the next 300 years. And this little piece of shit had the unmitigated gall to threaten Trump. Trump must be LHBO right now.

  • jwm February 14, 2020, 3:56 PM

    When I was twenty-one I was determined to self-educate myself by reading every Great Book I could find. Of course, Moby Dick was one of them. I was used to long difficult reads, but Moby Dick was not at all easy. Truth to tell, I didn’t like it much. Now I can understand that I didn’t simply couldn’t understand it. When I was in college twelve years later, my Shakespeare professor told us that no one without children, or under sixty years old could understand King Lear. I scoffed. He was right. Now that I have a few years under my belt I realize that the same holds true for Faust. When I first read your essay, I wondered how writing a novel could break a man. I’m not writing a novel, but now I know what you were talking about.


  • H February 14, 2020, 6:24 PM

    Like the white whale, this little ditty has tasked me for decades, beginning with the Watergate era.


  • Jack February 15, 2020, 9:01 AM

    JWM, I liked your comment and can relate. I’m not an intellectual guy but one of my old, fast friends was, and he led me to read several books which, at that period in my life, I’d never heard of. One of those was A Portrait Of The Artist As A Young Man, by James Joyce.

    I wallowed in that awful thing for a week or so and finally said “screw it” and one night our ship’s 1MC announced “the fantail is now open”. I wagged off to the stern and tossed Joyce into the impenetrable blackness of a dark and roiling sea and breathed a huge sigh of relief. Never got near him again.

    Years later, after watching’No Country for Old Men’ I picked up Cormac McCarthy’s POS Blood Meridian. I read it but (I have a minor in English with emphasis on technical writing and expository prose) rather than throwing it off some fantail I eased it into a trash bag and sent it where it really belonged.

  • Daniel K Day February 15, 2020, 10:30 AM

    Jack, re Blood Meridian, me too. I made it about 30 pages into that POS and then took it back to the library. I read NCFOM and The Road, not bad.

  • SoylentGreen February 15, 2020, 5:37 PM

    You have inspired me to read Moby Dick! Thank you.

  • James ONeil February 18, 2020, 12:08 PM

    First read M’s M D quite reluctantly, in High School were, afterwards, our literature instructor, Father Ward, was called, behind his back of course, unaffectionately, Whale Belly.

    Read again in college, with some comprehension.

    Again, in my forties, with long pauses for contemplation.

    Last time, in my seventies, purely for the pleasure of the well wrought work.

    Having said that, just a moment ago, I found myself picking up Umberto Eco’s The Island of the Day Before, off my shelf for a re-read.

    A parenthetical aside; (Anyone else inclined to read Eco’s The Island … , I’d suggest reading at the same time, Dava Sobel’s Longitude, to find the fact in Eco’s fiction. Why yes wounded dogs were tried as a method of measuring longitude.)

  • ND Martin February 18, 2020, 10:49 PM

    A 10th grade classmate, when called upon to read the beginning of Moby Dick aloud, summarized Melville’s great work in one simple line: “Call me fishmeal.”

  • Elise4 February 19, 2020, 11:59 PM

    I disagree with the premise that we are headed toward some dreadful fate. Yes, the future is unknown and change is in the air. But Trump is no Captain Ahab set on a vengeful course.

    The only ones justifiably fearful are those whose past actions are now coming to light, and whose chickens hopefully will soon be coming home to roost.