« All You Need Is Paper: Why Antique Valentines Still Melt Modern Hearts | Main | This is a presidential nomination, but it is also an armed negotiation. »

February 11, 2016

Militarily, Trump seems like the lowest risk of any candidate we have ever seen.

Clinton and Rubio – to pick two examples – are probably in the pocket of the military industries. T
hose two are likely to start expensive wars for profit, like past presidents. THAT seems dangerous to me. Trump is the least likely to start a war to benefit the defense industry. Sanders is anti-war too, but his military might look weak to outsiders and invite some risk. Militarily, Trump seems like the lowest risk of any candidate we have ever seen. Why Does Trump Terrify People? | Scott Adams Blog

Posted by gvanderleun at February 11, 2016 5:46 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

At this point there is no more arguing.

You are either for the same ol' establishment or you want to try something different.

It's really that simple.

All politics now are simple window dressing for all out civil war.

The future's coming straight at you whether you're ready for it or not and it's going to be like nothing anyone has ever seen before.

Ponder this message well for one day you will reflect back on it and wonder why you didn't take it seriously.

--the seer. 2099

Posted by: ghostsniper [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 12, 2016 4:31 AM

Right you are Ghost. Trump in old parlance is plain speakin'. It sounds like war talk because it is. The Jackasses don't want to face Trump in the elections; that's why the media touts Rubio as the one Hillary is fearin' in November.

Posted by: Vermont Woodchuck [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 12, 2016 5:53 AM

Well put Ghost. Incredibly sad but true.

Posted by: Jack [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 12, 2016 9:58 AM

For a sample of what is coming to the Amerika we all love, take a gander at Europe. The police state here is all primed and ready to kill you and me to defend the "new arrivals". You and me so to say, are individuals who reason. The new crowd arriving daily are unable to reason --- born slaves to any master with a can of free beans.

Posted by: Terry [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 12, 2016 3:33 PM

Terry, while the idiocy is growing here, it hasn't taken hold everywhere. This Country will survive but not in it's current configuration. Where the secession lines will form is still somewhat murky but that fracture will take place. That happens right along with the Second Civil War; that being resolved with armed borders.

You're dealing with ideologies; there is no reconciliation twixt them. Those holding opposing beliefs will either leave of their own volition, be driven out or killed.

the "Trail of Tears" will look like a Sunday School picnic hike.

Posted by: Vermont Woodchuck [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2016 5:43 AM

There's a another, more nefarious option veedub. Those that pretend to convert to the ideals of the freedomists but harbor their lifelong collectivists ideals below the surface so that they won't be killed.

They will hibernate, to resurface later, to stab you in your trusting back.

Remember them now so that you can recall them later. Once a tyrant always a tyrant and the only remedy is death to the vermin, no exceptions ever. To exclude one, for various pussified reasons, leads to peril for all.

I mentioned this in another post.
It gets to the guts of the matter when you hear the oft bantered claim of "brother against brother" in the War of Northern Aggression.

Can you kill a relative or close friend, because his mind has been programmed to kill you, even if he is disguised otherwise?

Posted by: ghostsniper [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2016 6:42 AM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)