« Who Says There's No Good News? | Main | Help! I’m Trapped in a Drop of Water »

January 22, 2016

The Sore Losers at National Review Continue to Dampen Their Panties

buckley.jpeg

Over twenty “movement Conservatives” penned diatribes against the Donald in the latest issue of National Review.
For the most part, these barely rise above the level of “democrats r real racists guyz!” to denunciations of “nativism”, and faux patrician concerns about “vulgarity” as defined by Leo Strauss (I’m looking at you Kristol). What we are seeing is no more than the death throes of Conservatism Inc. in a wild temper tantrum. -- Radix Journal

Posted by gerardvanderleun at January 22, 2016 5:30 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

Conservatism has not been alive at the National Review for two decades.
The place is riddled with the Zionist Neo-con filth.

Posted by: bilejones [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 22, 2016 6:52 PM

@bilejones

Thank you for displaying your honest beliefs about the demise of Conservatism at the NR.

Please let us know the pertinent details of who, by name and by what actions, produced the riddling.

Was one of them Jonah Goldberg, author of 'Liberal Fascism?'

Do you consider Trump a true Conservative as Mark Levin would define a Conservative?

What are the characteristics defining a Conservative in your view?

Do you believe Thomas Sowell is not a Conservative, or is a (Christian)Zionist Neo-con filth?

Is there Zionist Neo-con cleanliness at NR or elsewhere or only filth? How do you recognize ZN-c filth -- by expression of differences of opinion and/or action?

Which ones?

Is it possible that Trump's NR critics do not consider him a Conservative by their honest definition -- which definition is not shared by other political pundits who may not be pandits?

Is it possible that Trump is a decent, patriotic American with a range of views on the economy, domestic and foreign affairs varying with the significance of the context for national survival and thrival?

I ask because I believe the 2nd sentence of your honest opinion, to say the best of it, is misleading and unrealistic.

Posted by: Stug Guts [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 22, 2016 10:04 PM

Stug, bilejones doesn't know. He read that somewhere and said to himself,"Self, that sounds so smart and cool, I'll say that too." so he did.

Posted by: Vermont Woodchuck [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 23, 2016 4:28 AM

In the 80's I had a small TV next to my drawing board and in the afternoon I'd watch an hour long show on PBS named "The Constitution, that delicate balance" and Bill Buckley was my favorite of the 10-12 commentors. As he spoke it was with carefully chosen words and when he applied emphasis he looked right at his target, raised his eyebrows and voice, and burned 2 holes right though him. Almost scary.

Posted by: ghostsniper [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 23, 2016 7:51 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)