« "Kill all they send..." | Main | Shopping at Penneys. Sorry: JCP. Sorry, Penneys »

May 8, 2013

The Short Answer

I was once told by a "€œgun safety"€ advocate back in the Nineties that he favored total civilian firearms confiscation.

  Only the military and police should have weapons he averred and what did I think about that?  I began to give him a reasoned answer and he cut me off with an abrupt, "Give me the short answer." I thought for a moment and said, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you."€ -- Tyrants beware. 4th Generation Warfare: How the next civil war will be fought.

Posted by gerardvanderleun at May 8, 2013 10:45 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

The people that won't call a Senator or speak up at a union meeting are going to shoot a cop?

You will fight about half as well as you practice. If you practice acceptance and hiding you will be like the Jews in Shindler's List at the train station denying to the last moment that you are being sent to your death.


Posted by: Scott M at May 8, 2013 11:55 AM

No,I will not comply, period.

Don't Comply, you need the practice.

Posted by: Scott M at May 8, 2013 12:10 PM

The problem with the whole civil war thing is that its not laid down on geographic boundaries. Every state, every major population area is dominated by at least one city that's hard left. They control manufacturing, imports, laws, arms storage, transportation, communications, national guard, etc. Yes, they need the food, but they outnumber rural people and have the means to get the food. It wouldn't be a matter of x states going up against y states. it would be a matter of rural areas, out manned and choked off by trade embargos, fighting against urban areas. Not a pretty concept.

And civil war is always, always, horrific.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 8, 2013 1:03 PM

The fight is coming to a town near you whether it's well-defined, contained, convenient, on-time, or like any other. Nothing but pushback stops the bullies. Conservatives keep deciding today is not the day and this is not the fight to be fought. That decision. daily and repeatedly, means the pushback, if it ever happens, must be more violent and more comprehensive that it would be if they pushbacked today on smaller issues. Deciding not to resist means having to become like animals later. It isn't necessary but it is what happens when we do nothing.

Who here would rather stack sandbags and apply a tournequet to your kid's leg than protest at a gov't office? If I am wrong what will stop them, a logical argument or an election? We are going the way of the Euro conservatives, quiet and compliant.

Posted by: Scott M at May 8, 2013 5:55 PM

If the balloon ever does go up, steer clear of these ex Constitutional Militia guys. In the Nineties, half of them turned out to be Federal Informants, including one fellow who is quoted prominently in the essay.

Posted by: Lorne at May 8, 2013 6:02 PM

"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves. " Churchill

Posted by: Scott M at May 8, 2013 11:28 PM

Wow, wonderful weblog format! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for? you made blogging glance easy. The total glance of your website is excellent, let alone the content material!

Posted by: promotoredellaliberta at June 15, 2013 8:19 AM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)