« Please allow me to quote my favorite source, me. | Main | Let It Bleed: More on the Now Infinitely Screwed Bunghole Called San Francisco »

November 11, 2010

Spambot wants to help California in her hour of need

This spam comment just in attached to the above:
Hi, I’m Michael, a 37 year old dog trainer, with specialist experience in rectifying hostile behaviour in macho dogs who are becoming a danger. I work with local government agencies in my home town of Luton to help circulate consciousness of dog attacks and how to prevent them. My work has taken me to schools, hospitals and prison houses, and I am passionate about helping people live a peaceful happy lifetime with their dogs.
Ah, my poor native state. Still, there's nothing like a bottom to help a state to bottom.

Posted by Vanderleun at November 11, 2010 9:01 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

The problem in California, is that there are not enough minorities represented in the community/dog liaison community. I suggest appointing a diversity coordinator with a staff, and an office to oversee all community/dog liaison field workers to ensure that minorities are properly represented.


Posted by: jwm at November 11, 2010 9:35 AM

I'm sure we already have a Department of Community - Dog Relations AND a Commission on Human-Canine Outreach, as well as HR93456578 soon-to-be-passed by our legislature that will regulate the carbon-footprint and CO2 content of Canine-Americans.

Posted by: Stephen B at November 11, 2010 10:07 AM

Stand by for an anti-dog-bully public service campaign.

Posted by: Pappy at November 11, 2010 12:09 PM

And don't forget Proposition 11793 permitting dogs to marry (and not just civil unions, buster!).

Posted by: Don Rodrigo at November 11, 2010 12:21 PM

So now we're emasculating dogs psychologically as well? It's not enough we cut their nuts off?

What is it with the trans-species androgynation of living things?

Posted by: Don Rodrigo at November 11, 2010 12:25 PM

Dennis Prager makes the point the liberal agenda for animals is freedom, leave them in pristine habitats at the expense of people and close even the most progressive zoo habitat. At the same time the liberal prescription for humans is to build zoos for them.

Liberals argue that even the best possible zoo is a tragedy because no amount of "enrichment" will produce a habitat with enough fulfillment as the natural world. On the other hand, liberal believe that they can create a perfect environment for people if they just manipulate the inputs properly.

On Dennis Prager's show he had on Ingrid Newkirk who has adament that even the lowly cockroah had immutable rights that no man may violate. As to the rights of a fetus, she was agnostic.

Liberalism is a retrovirus *meant* to destroy mankind. The fact your liberal neighbor doesn't know that is the purpose doesn't change the fact.

Posted by: Scott M at November 12, 2010 6:08 PM