« Bad Americans! No Doughnut for You! | Main | Meanwhile, inside Austin city limits.... »

May 14, 2010

Do We Deserve a Mosque at Ground Zero?

islam-dominated-america-flag.jpg


The second attack on the World Trade Center is coming.
It will stand 13 stories high, cost $100 million dollars and include a mosque. Known as Cordoba House -- the name echoing an early caliphate that, of course, subjugated non-Muslims -- it will be located two blocks away from where our magnificent towers crashed and burned, easy wafting distance for the Islamic call to prayer.

Maybe we deserve such a mosque at Ground Zero. It will serve as the perfect monument to post-9/11 America, a shining reproach to a nation that long ago capitulated through loss, or worse, absence of will. Not that it will be widely seen that way. Aside from the torment and seething of survivors, both family and professional family of the 9/11 dead, aside from blog noise and tabloid venting, the phony narrative of Cordoba House as a kind of healing outreach center -- pure deception -- appears ready for chiseling into stone. And that's not because Cordoba's flimflamming Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf obfuscates everything negative about Islam (jihad, for instance), and promotes everything antithetical to Western liberty (Sharia), often with jarring Western references. ("To Muslim ears," he writes, "Sharia law means ... the conditions necessary for what Americans call the pursuit of happiness.") That is, it's not only the efforts of Imam Rauf that are the problem. It's because nearly nine years after 9/11, we are still stupid enough to buy them. -- Diana West > Home - Do We Deserve a Mosque at Ground Zero?>Diana West

Posted by Vanderleun at May 14, 2010 5:17 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

3rd. Third attack is coming.

Posted by: RC2 at May 14, 2010 8:30 AM

This reminds me: WHEN will the new twin towers be built. Ever?

Posted by: Don Rodrigo at May 14, 2010 10:08 AM

In case some readers are not sure of what RC2 refers to:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_1993_bombings

This would be another case where Eric Holder, the Attorney General of the United States of America, would not be able to put his finger on exactly why this "incident" occurred.

Posted by: JD at May 14, 2010 12:43 PM

Yes, you do deserve a mosque at Ground Zero. For the sake of money, America (or to be more precise its then President) decided to attack a completely different country from the one responsible, and not to attack the centre of the evil infection that caused 9/11 in the first place.

Were there any justice and an American president of the time willing to enforce it, another mosque - the Grand Mosque that contained the Kaaba - would now be a crater that glows in the dark.

The Third Conjecture is coming. Soon. And, yes, it is Bush's fault.

Posted by: Fletcher Christian at May 15, 2010 12:25 AM

While we are at it, why don't we just have a symbol of the swastika on top of all the Federal Buildings. Why the hell not?

Posted by: Cilla Mitchell, Galveston Texas at May 15, 2010 1:22 AM

If you read "Inside the Kingdom", you'll find the Sauds thought Bush did them no favors, the likes of
Prince Nayif is so clueless, he was almost blown up for his trouble

Posted by: narciso at May 15, 2010 9:31 AM

If you believed "Inside the Kingdom", you are a sucker for Saudi propaganda.

Posted by: Fat Man at May 16, 2010 1:16 PM

Yes, if we can fit 2,752 muhammedans inside for a pulled-pork barbeque, the damned heathen dark ages barbarians. Sacrilege heaped upon dhimmitude there, NY. Fight back or submit.

Posted by: twolaneflash at May 16, 2010 6:42 PM

Actually it is more candid on Bin Laden's ties to the Wahhabi state, then they probably intended, and
what they feel about Obama, they find him a very
easy mark, not surprising except they would openly admit it

Posted by: narciso at May 16, 2010 9:04 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)