Woman #1: I don’t think I have ever met a man who is an extreme Leftie Democrat who isn’t a complete pussy.
Why is it that virtually all males whose sentiments lay at that end of the political spectrum all seem to be girly men, gay, 98-pound weaklings, failures at business, librarians, fops, Ned Flanders, Hollywood entertainers who would not be employed otherwise, or ankle-biting sycophants? I’ve never met a man who calls himself a “feminist” or supports OxFam to be the least bit attractive. Is there a connection between low testosterone and supporting Libtard causes?
Woman #2: Dudette, you triggered my soapbox button! ￼:-P
It started in the 70s. Men started saying they were feminists so they could get laid. These things usually come down to one or all of three things: money, sex, power.
Throughout the 70s, 80s and 90s, men fell into a state of general confuzzlement about women. Open the door and be called a male chauvinist pig, or don’t open the door and be called a rude, mysoginist asshole?
Men are always trying to figure out what women want. Women are constantly amazed that men are not psychic. Men aren’t especially fond of loud, rage-filled, man-hating chicks, but it was de rigeur back then, for my generation, to be *powerful,* and for we young women, anger was often confused with power. So even though many of us were obnoxious, men put up with it, because they still wanted to have sex with us.
This is where the pussification started.
[HT Never Yet Melted]