Glad to see you back. I was concerned that you might have been hacked (as I was). Or fallen into a well.Posted by Dave Schuler at February 16, 2006 6:22 AM
Yes, glad to see you back. I was wondering what happened.Posted by Eric Blair at February 16, 2006 6:42 AM
I was worried.
Now I'm not.
Hey Gerard, I need to change my template a tiny bit.
I know you are busy.
I wear as a badge of pride that you did the original.
Please, either give it look and write OR tell me someone who can do some minor stuff.Posted by Steel at February 16, 2006 7:04 AM
Welcome back. Returning to your site each morning to find a remarkable depiction of a blizzard with whiteout conditions was mystifying and worrying, especially in light of Michelle Malkin's post about the cyber-jihad.
Glad to hear it was just the usual gremlins in the machine.Posted by Mike Lief at February 16, 2006 7:24 AM
And here I thought that you had just . . . well . . . drawn a blank.Posted by Everyman at February 16, 2006 7:37 AM
Welcome home.Posted by Dennis at February 16, 2006 8:42 AM
Nice to have you back, Gerard. You must have had a frustrating week.Posted by Jonathan at February 16, 2006 9:23 AM
Good to see you back, Gerard. But really, after your piece on players - "out of space" ? It satisfies Occam but no one else. How about "while trying to save the time I usually spend deleting flamers by adding a liberal bullshit emulsifier to my modem, the bits were scrambled and Microsoft's best engineers took a week to fix it" or "I was in Morocco inspecting camels with MoDo and after a week trying to separate her from her favorite, a big bruiser named CudBud, I left her cultivating a case of extreme beard burn and came home to find the NYT had relatiated by eating my posts".
We missed you.Posted by AskMom at February 16, 2006 10:38 AM
I too was wondering. And am glad to see you back.