" Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act. "
GWB decided within hours of Sept 11 that this enemy would be a problem for us for decades or generations. He had the tools to vanquish this enemy within hours, he chose instead to pull The Vietnam War Plan out of storage and let soldiers WALK through neighborhoods in Capitan separating "sheep from goat" between IEDS and sandstorms.
The easiest way to predict the future is to create it. Defund the CIA and ISIS disappears.
The easiest way to predict the future is to create it. Defund the CIA and ISIS disappears."
Nah. Probably not.
GWB should have made one call on September 12 to Putin with the message, "Four tactical nukes: Tehran, Mecca, Baghdad and Kabul, no negotiating" and hung up.
Just imagine what a peaceful world we would be in today. No hand wringing leftards, no hysterical feminazis. NO BARACK OBAMA.
ghost: That was a really badly thought out comment.
The truth is that nothing the United States or any non-Muslim Country has done or said can change a thing about Islam and the Muslims.
ISIS has nothing to do with anything the US has done. It is pure triple distilled Islam. The truth is that Jihad, the holy war against the infidels is the most important sacrament of Islam. It is to Islam what the Lord's Supper is to Christians. Go read Spengler's essay "Jihad and Self-Sacrifice in Islam" linked in the sidebar.
Jihad began with Mohamed, it was continued by every Muslim group since then. The Europeans broke the progress of Jihad by military superiority and imperialism during the 18th Century. But, since the collapse of European Empires after WWII, Jihad has begun to reassert itself. And, ISIS is one of the reassertions.
Here are our choices if we want to suppress Jihad. 1. Punish Jihad so severely that Muslims rethink their religion and stop, such punishments might begin with nuking Mecca, anything less will not be understood as a punishment. 2. "Exterminate all the brutes!". 3. Surrender.
I favor number 1.
As for the CIA, I care not a fig. I think one mistake that George Bush made was not firing every one in the CIA and the FBI on 9/12/2001, just after he ordered the nuclear bombing of mecca and Medina. That said, the US must maintain various capabilities now supposedly institutionalized by the CIA. Unless, of course, your choice is number 3.
Guess what? The president used to have these people called strategic advisors. They would think about the world and things strategically, you know? This means that you game in your mind what is happening, why it happens, and then make good guesses as to what different courses of action will produce, or what will develop down the road. have you ever heard of that? DOOD! It was so cool when we used to do that. I wonder why we don't do that now, you know?
2007...this would be about the time that clot of Zionist neo-conz making Moron43's foreign policy first floated the idea of arming Sunni "rebels" in Syria in order to overthrow Assad, break the Shi'a Cresent (just created by overthrowing Sadaam in Iraq), and cut off the flow of weapons from Iran to Hezbollah in S. Lebanon. Result: ISIS. And along the way, attendant bloodbaths in Libya and the Ukraine. Keep at it, ZOGsters. The catastrophe you are creating will be your downfall.
President Bush was very prescient.
And GWB was so superior in every way to President Zero that there cannot even be a comparison made. Not saying that Bush was great, but the abomination we have now should be replaced with an 'A-Bomb-a-nation' President. That target nation needs to be in the Middle East; Medina or Mecca. For starters.
Unless those devils are either exterminated, or get such a painful spanking that they will not dare to flaunt their 'religion' for a hundred years, they will continue to grow stronger. Make no mnistake, we face an existential threat.
What happens when ISIS or one of its clones gets hold of nukes? Because it's not a matter of 'if', but when. Don't engage in wishful thinking, because it will happen. And there are other weapons just as horrific as nukes, if not worse.
Is there any doubt that those barbarians — who happily burn childrn to death (!!!), and wantonly murder as many innocent people outside their group as possible — would be civilized enough to use nuclear weapons as simply a bargaing chip?
No. As soon as they can get their bloody hands on nukes, they will detonate them wherever they will cause the most carnage. Add a little flourine to the nuke, and the number killed will be doubled and squared.
Word up, friends: it's not a matter of if, it is a matter of when. And 'when' will happen just as soon as they get hold of nukes. ISIS controls plenty of oil wells. They are already swimming in loot — and there are still nukes unaccounted for, after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Let us hope and pray that it won't happen while the current pathetic excuse for a Commander-in-Chief is in office. Because he is far too sympathetic to their cause.