Pow, right in the kisser!
A nit to pick: the predecessor to Windows 95 was Windows 3.1, not Windows 2.Posted by Donald Sensing at October 24, 2009 6:52 AM
Good catch on the nitpick, Rev. Sensing, but do you remember Windows 2? (Especially compared to the early Mac OS?) What an awful clunker that was!Posted by BobK at October 24, 2009 8:33 AM
One thing for sure about the Apple guy, he'd never be so unhip as to live past the age of 30. Or buy a tie. Or tuck his shirt in.
But he'll always have this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xgls9IwWUyUPosted by Rob De Witt at October 24, 2009 11:35 AM
I think they were cutting MS a little slack, that Win95 wasn't so bad after Windows 3.11---of course, some of us remember Win95 had a lot of problems until Service Pack 2.
They could have gone back farther and mentioned how DOS 6 sucked after DOS 5 and DOS 4 REALLY sucked after DOS 3, but I suppose most of the market isn't old enough to rememberPosted by Marty at October 24, 2009 6:51 PM