December 31, 2004

Why the Red Sox Will Continue to Crush the Yankees

by CHRIS LYNCH American Digest Sports Editor


Yes the Yankees just landed Randy Johnson and I wouldn't be surprised to see them get Carlos Beltran either. They are still not better than the Red Sox.

After reading Buster Olney's column yesterday - I had to remind myself that Buster was the beat reporter on the Yankees for many years and his "like" of the Yankees is well known. My bias is towards the Red Sox (but at least I'm upfront with that). I'll tell you how I see things and you decide.

The way I see it, when looking at the teams position by position - it currently stands:

This is assuming that the Yankees sign Beltran - otherwise Johnny Damon has it in centerfield all over an aging Bernie Williams. This also grants that catcher and short are equal (arguments can be made by either side).

The Red Sox also have a substantial edge in bench depth with Doug Mirabelli and Jay Payton coming off the bench (probably the best back-up catcher and outfielder in MLB).

Tell me Buster - where is the Yankees' advantage? Is it in the fact that the Yankees will be dealing with Giambi and Sheffield steroid's questions all year? Or do the Red Sox have an advantage in that they now have the curse of the Bambino off their shoulders whereas the Yankees get to be reminded about the greatest choke-job in history all year?

Is it in age? Because the starting line-up for the Red Sox averages 1.1 years less than the Yankees (and is therefore less prone to injury).

Starting pitching? Well lets take a look.

Randy Johnson is a great pitcher. He's coming off a Cy Young type season. The last time the Yankees snagged a pitcher of Johnson's stature (so to speak) was Roger Clemens. When Roger came to the Yankees - he went 14-10 with a 4.60 ERA his first season. You want better from Johnson? Compare how Javier Vazquez did in his last year in the NL vs. what Johnson did this year:

The guide-post seems to point to about a 15-9 type season with a 4.00 ERA (assuming that Johnson is better at handling NYC than either Clemens or Vazquez in his first year). I'm being generous here. Johnson couldn't do better than Roger head up in the NL this year - how is he going to be better than what Roger was able to do in NYC at age 36 when the Unit will be 41 going into 2005? The year before he arrived in New York - Clemens went 20-6 with a 2.61 ERA.

Do you think Johnson has a 20+ win season in 2005 like his buddy Schilling had with the Red Sox in 2004? Survey says - NO. At best - I'd rate the teams #1 starter as a draw.

The rest of the rotation?

The Yankees have Mike Mussina, Carl Pavano, Jaret Wright and Kevin Brown. This assumes that Kevin Brown is still with the team which is a big "if" because he's definitely persona non grata in Yankee-land. Who do they get to replace Brown if he's dumped? Not much left in the free-agent pool. Do you think the Red Sox would look forward to teeing off on Derek Lowe? Also consider that the Yankees farm system is pretty much bare - so forget making a trade.

The Red Sox counter with David Wells as number 2. Let's stop here for a minute. Wells had a better winning percentage (12-8 vs. 12-9), more innings pitched (31 more) and a much better ERA than Mussina (3.73 vs 4.59 or 108 ERA+ vs 98 ERA+ - just to take the league differences into account). Tell me again how Mussina is a better number 2.

I'll give you Pavano over Matt Clement but I won't give you Pavano over a healthy Wade Miller. Wright over Bronson Arroyo? Please. In addition to Wade Miller - the Red Sox can also offer up Tim Wakefield who had more wins, innings pitched and strikeouts than Kevin Brown.

Hey Buster - tell me again why the Yankees will be so great next year. I could use a good laugh.

AMERICAN DIGEST SPORTS EDITOR Chris Lynch serves his own brew daily at A Large Regular , and contributes to

Lynch can be reached at

Posted by Vanderleun at December 31, 2004 9:05 AM
Bookmark and Share



"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

The Yankees, Chris, will rule because the Sox, even if they do get lucky once a CENTURY!!!, suck out of long practice. They will return to their sucking ways. They can't help it. They are THE CHAMPIONS

Posted by: Buster at December 31, 2004 12:35 PM

I can't wait for Opening Day when chants of "19-18" get replaced with chants of "year two thousand - year two thousand".


Posted by: chris at January 1, 2005 7:03 AM

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first let win the World Series --- ONCE!

Posted by: Buster at January 1, 2005 11:54 AM

Poor little Buster still seems upset from the utter humiliation handed to him and his beloved Yankees in the ALCS. Cheer up, Buster, your buddy Steinbrenner will spend around $220mil this year (they're already at $205mil without Beltran). How much money has he spent since 2000 to NOT win any World Series?

To quote Rick Reilly of Sports Illustrated
(from "Break Up the Bombers: The Yankees on Trial" on HBO):
"You can always find something to hate about the Yankees. It's like rooting for Brad Pitt to get the girl or Bill Gates to win the lotto. There's no fun in it. It just takes no imagination. No heart. No loyalty."

Posted by: Shawn at January 1, 2005 2:09 PM

Hey, how about them Mets?

We Mets fans are the ones who believe in miracles.

And as for the Yankees vs. the Red Sox, the best you can say is that the Yankess don't look like somebody who just got up from a meth binge and an incest festival in a trailer park.

Seriously, I hope to see a Sox that looks a little more bathed and washed and groomed next season.

Scuzzzzzzy guys, one and all.

Posted by: Win Strang at January 1, 2005 2:56 PM

*What* about the Mets?! Other than the Yankees, they've squandered more money than any other team in recent history without winning a World Series. They've also made some of the most disastrous deals in history: Mo Vaughn, Pedro Martinez, trading Ryan to the Angels... Have fun with pouty Petey. We loved him for 7 years but he showed his true colors recently. You'll be lucky to get 2 years out of that shoulder.

As for the Sox appearance: What do you care? Are you planning on dating any of them? They're athletes, not beauty pageant contestants. Gee, look how great Juiceambi has been since going to NY and becoming "clean-cut".

Great job in 2000, BTW. Lowest rated World Series in history. Could it be because no one outside of NY gives a rat's ass about either team?

Posted by: Shawn at January 1, 2005 3:27 PM

The Mets? Might as well debate the Brewers for all it matters.

That said - I think it would be nice to see Glavive finish in a Red Sox uniform.

Posted by: chris at January 1, 2005 4:42 PM