September 21, 2012

Suppress the Vote! Technique # 1


HT: Santos

Posted by Vanderleun at September 21, 2012 4:30 PM
Bookmark and Share



"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

And it's a Government Motors car, too.

Posted by: Donald Sensing at September 21, 2012 5:01 PM

Due to unprecedented political division in the country we are asking Republicans to vote on Tuesday Nov. 6th and Democrats to vote on Wednesday Nov. 7.

Posted by: Scott M at September 21, 2012 6:28 PM

I wonder if it is one of those Volts everyone is clamoring to buy?

Posted by: Tom at September 21, 2012 7:00 PM


Posted by: Jimmy J. at September 21, 2012 8:04 PM

The bumper sticker makes the car owner a Dolt.

Posted by: Jewel at September 21, 2012 8:34 PM

I wonder if it is one of those Volts everyone is clamoring to buy?

Unlikely. This one looks as though it was able to actually drive all the way to a parking lot.

Posted by: Mumblix Grumph at September 21, 2012 8:34 PM

Do you think this election will be as close as the media seems to be portraying it as?

Posted by: mjazz at September 22, 2012 5:26 AM

No, I think Obama will be the clear winner. (Sorry, but I can't believe Romney was the best the GOP could do.)

Posted by: Mike at September 22, 2012 12:25 PM

It ought to be a shoo-in.
Four more years of this dufus is downright scary.

Posted by: mjazz at September 22, 2012 1:34 PM

There is no sense in listening to the polls, following the polls, or trying to guess the outcome of the election.

First, the election is settled state by state. The national accumulated popular vote, which is what the polls attempt to anticipate, is meaningless. Each state will have its vote go to Obama or Romney, whether the candidate wins/loses by one or one million votes. A few states with large populations easily distort reality. Even if everybody in NY and CA vote for Obama, which would distort national popular vote counts, they still account for the same number of Electoral votes.

Second, nobody will know until the Democrats voters show up on Wed Nov. 7 to cast their vote which of these polls turns out to be right. Why let a false conclusion of a poll influence you now? Last time Rasmussen pre-election polling turned out to be closest to the actual outcome. Before that I think Zogby turned out to be closest to the mark. We won't know which of these polls was right until after the fact. We do know right now that many of these polls will be wrong. We just don't know which will be wrong.

Third, as the news business has gotten more and more dishonest, or at least unmoored from professional standards, polling has used tricks to shade the outcome toward the intended direction. Do you care what 19 people in a Whole Food grocery store parking lot pick for POTUS. Do you know how many people make up the poll you are hearing about? Do you know if these people have ever voted before? It matter a great deal if the poll is sampling people who technically might vote or people that voted last time. Do you know if the polling sampled far more Dems than Rep or Inds? Do you know if the answer has been adjusted to account for a distortion of the sample?

Fourth, the media routinely use reports of polling results, however accurate or not, to signal their audience what they should think. Most people want to be included with the larger group and the media reports are always careful suggest whether their audience should ignore the poll or incorporate the poll data personally.

Michael Medved makes the point no POTUS has ever been reelected to a second term unless his support increased over the support he had in his first election. That's to say, every POTUS reelected gets more votes the second time than the first time or they lose. There is no second term exception in US history. Does anyone think Obama has more support from college kids, black voters, working class voters now than during the Hopeandchange Hurricane of 2008? This doesn't decide who will be the winner in November but it should settle some fears.

Fifth, it will be what it will be. No amount of happiness or despair now will decide anything. It's like worrying if it will rain on your future wedding date. It will or it won't and you can't know in advance. You should prepare for both possibilities.

Lastly, stop watching the media, including Fox. They have 24/7 to fill. That doesn't mean what they put on air is worth knowing. You are in charge of you and you should not let them make decisions for you and your time. Talk to the people around you, don't miss an opportunity for that, but ignore what The Media sends your way. Their job is to convince you that you need to worry and to tune it to get answers. They never provide the answers except to tune in after their 98th commercial of the hour to see if they've answered the concern they've been hawking all day. They can't know what it is you probably want to know. They will get the answer about a minute before the rest of on election night. Until then they are guessing. Now is a good time to note who is claiming what so you can judge their accuracy after the election. Remember, FOX news is using Karl Rove and Dick Morris as their experts on this matter. Dick Morris of "the elction will be between Condi and Hillary" and Rove of "ignore the media GWB the people will to." Both men have their particular segment of the party they are working for/against. They don't turn that off when they go on Fox. Rove's career will be over if TEA Party types control the party. Morris' vendetta is against the Clinton wing of the Dems. Be wary of anything either man says in those directions. It's much simpler to just stop watching the media, they don't know any more than you. They just read the same sources you could read and then retell the story on camera. Read it for yourself. That's what a citizen would do.

Posted by: Scott M at September 22, 2012 3:02 PM

Scott M.

Well said.

Posted by: David at September 22, 2012 5:08 PM

Do I think this will be a "close" election?

No. I think Romney will win it quite handily.

Posted by: vanderleun at September 22, 2012 5:20 PM

I fervently hope that you are right, Gerard; while wishing that the GOP had found a better candidate to oppose him, I fear that it is a racing certainty that the electorate cannot do worse than re-electing the current incumbent, who, always supposing he was born in the USA, is streets ahead as its most despicable traitor, ever - and a cowardly one, to boot. And though it might be thought that as Englishman, it is none of my damned business, I'm sure that you at least will appreciate what this coming election will mean for your 'allies' (if that is what we still are as far as the POTUS is concerned). To be perfectly honest, given the policies followed by our own govern-mental incumbents, I'm not even sure that we deserve that accolade any more; they are allies of Obama it seems, but not allies of America.

Posted by: Frank P at September 23, 2012 5:30 AM

After the shellacking of the midterms, this administration has seen two years of continued downward spiral.

The polls do not accurately reflect the facts, for various reasons. The Bradley effect is but one. The conservative base is united in their loathing for all things Obama and will show up.

Posted by: Rocky at September 23, 2012 9:08 AM
Post a comment:

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated to combat spam and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

Remember personal info?