September 15, 2014

Do Democrats care about dead black men?

aaramarizguns.jpg

"In politics, unintended consequences are rare. By going after the weapons white suburbanites and rural people enjoy, Democrats obfuscate the real issue: Black young men killing black young men for profit in cities controlled by Democrats." -- Don Surber:

After 30 Years Of Lies, NY Times Admits "Assault Weapons Are A Myth" | Bearing Arms: The NY Times finally admitted that "assault weapons" are a made-up political term fabricated by anti-gun Democrats. Op-ed writer Lois Beckett also admitted that once the term was manufactured and used to outlaw a class of weapons that dishonest anti-gun Democrats had used to con an entire nation, nothing happened.

Posted by gerardvanderleun at September 15, 2014 3:48 PM
Bookmark and Share

Comments:

HOME

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

Regardless if it's a gun or a marshmallow if someone tries to prevent your ownership of anything at all they are trying to control you.

That person is genetically flawed and cannot be fixed and it will continually try to own you.

There is only one remedy for this.

Total and instant destruction at the source.

Anything less is coddling and encouraging.

Posted by: ghostsniper at September 15, 2014 7:37 PM

Statistics taken from the Center for Disease Control
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm

All injury deaths:
•Number of deaths: 187,464
•Deaths per 100,000 population: 60.2

All poisoning deaths:
•Number of deaths: 46,047
•Deaths per 100,000 population: 14.8

Motor vehicle traffic deaths:
•Number of deaths: 33,783
•Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.8

All firearm deaths:
•Number of deaths: 32,351
•Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.4

More statistics and interpretations here:
http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states

Posted by: chasmatic at September 15, 2014 9:42 PM

There might be a difference between the number of reported "homicides" and the number of "all firearm deaths". Just saying.

Posted by: Larry Geiger at September 16, 2014 6:54 AM

Just saying what, that more people were murdered in total than were murdered by guns?
Well, yeah, what's your point?

Posted by: ghostsniper at September 16, 2014 7:09 AM

@Larry — here's the numbers, easily accessed at this link. If you need help interpreting the data we are here for you.
A quick look has the number of firearms homicides at a little less than half the total homicides.
People will use knives, furniture, baseball bats, tire irons, their bare hands.

Taking a life rarely has any style. This from one who knows.

link: http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states

In the United States, annual homicides by any means total

2012: 14,827
2011: 15,953
2010: 16,259
2009: 16,799
2008: 17,826
2007: 18,361
2006: 18,573
2005: 18,124
2004: 17,357
2003: 17,732
2002: 17,638
2001: 20,308
2000: 16,765
1999: 16,889
1998: 14,276
1997: 18,208
1996: 19,645
1995: 21,606


In the United States, annual firearm homicides total

2012: 8,8962
2011: 11,101
2010: 11,078
2009: 11,493
2008: 12,179
2007: 12,632
2006: 12,791
2005: 12,352
2004: 11,624
2003: 11,920
2002: 11,829
2001: 11,348
2000: 10,801
1999: 10,828
1998: 9,25723

Posted by: chasmatic at September 16, 2014 10:38 AM

Do Democrats care about dead black men?

Heck Yeah! They can vote... duh.

Posted by: tomw at September 18, 2014 10:33 AM

Those firms that go through this assessment exercise sooner rather than later will find that they are well positioned to plan for the necessary changes to their business model and their operations, minimising business disruption and compliance costs.

Posted by: http://vinhtri.com/?celine=celine-luggage-tote-sale at September 25, 2014 1:18 PM