≡ Menu

Long Read of the Day: The Kenosha Shootings / Kyle Rittenhouse: A Tactical and Legal Analysis

[EXCERPTED] By now the majority of you will have seen or heard of the pair of engagements in Kenosha, Wisconsin (hereinafter the “Engagements”) between one Kyle Rittenhouse and a number of other individuals, some recently departed, others now unfortunately unable to operate a keyboard with any efficiency, particularly when proper capitalization is required of their typewritten text. In the wake of these encounters, it is quite something to see the degree of bad information, misinformation, and disinformation that has showered the socialinterwebsitetubes, particularly from a tactical and legal perspective.

On the tactical side, it is surprising that matters seem so distorted, since the Engagements must rank among the most comprehensively filmed deadly force CQB incidents in some years (and one of the only engagements in recent memory involving an AR system). In fact, despite the poor lighting conditions, the mobile nature of the camera operators (none, to my knowledge, trained combat photographers), and the chaos of small unit action that will be familiar to anyone who has been in the midst of it, it is possible to view the most cogent parts of the engagement in vivid detail, from multiple camera angles, and with stereo sound. On the legal side, well, many new expert commentators may lack a formal law degree, but they did stay at a Holiday Inn Express (7887 94th Ave, Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin, 53158) and probably ordered several on-demand Better Call Saul episodes the night before the Engagements besides.

The tall individual wearing the hoodie, a blue cap, glasses, an olive drab, perhaps camouflage-patterned backpack, faded jeans and a red-accented face mask clutching a skateboard I have tentatively identified as one Anthony Huber, 26, of Silver Lake, Wisconsin. In 2012 Mr. Huber pled guilty to Felony “Strangulation and Suffocation” (with a Domestic Abuse modifier) and Felony False Imprisonment (with a Domestic Abuse and Use of a Dangerous Weapon modifier). Four other charges apparently from the same incident or incidents ranging from misdemeanor to felony level were dismissed. Mr. Huber received 3 years probation for his guilty plea. From the records available to me it appears that Mr. Huber violated his probation in 2016 and a sentence of 2 years (with a year credit) in State Prison was order, but it is unclear if this was a technical or material violation and if Huber was actually incarcerated for the violation.

The shorter, bald individual in the red short-sleeved shirt wearing [denim]? capri pants and white shoes with ankle-high white socks (this short, bald subject hereinafter the “Short Bald Subject” for brevity) MAY be is Joseph D. Rosenbaum, 36. Rosembaum is (was) subject to a life-long sex offender registration order in Wisconsin for his Arizona conviction on two counts of Sexual Conduct with a Minor in 2002. Sentenced to 10 years in prison, he appears to have been incarcerated in Arizona from 2002 until paroled in 2012. He apparently violated his parole by tampering with a monitoring device in 2014 and may have been incarcerated thereafter. During his incarceration he racked up dozens of corrections institute disciplinary violations for offences including Assault with a Weapon, Assault on Staff, Arson, and Possession of Narcotics.

It is difficult to be certain, but it appears from the video that the two individuals, Short Bald Subject and Huber, are acquainted, if not acting in concert.

Both appear to aggressively challenge the group “protecting” the Ultimate establishment, but Short Bald Subject is much more confrontational. He verbally berates the defenders:

Short Bald Subject: “Don’t point no motherfucking gun at me [homes.]? [Unintelligible]. [I’ll fuck you]? with anything you got. Shoot me n***er. Shoot me n***er. [Bust on me]? n***er. For real.” …

…. Having retrieved his skateboard, the third attacker, Huber, arrives a split second later having attempted to flank Rittenhouse from the rear. He kneels down on Rittenhouse, and the skateboard held in Huber’s right hand makes at least incidental contact with Rittenhouse’s left shoulder. Tangled somewhat with Rittenhouse, Huber attempts to control Rittenhouse’s rifle with his left hand and pull it away. Rittenhouse maintains control of the rifle and can be seen holding it with both hands as Huber pulls on it from [the back of the magazine]?. Rittenhouse ends up flat on his back. The rifle momentarily comes away from Rittenhouse’s body with Rittenhouse’s arms fully extended while retaining but the muzzle ends up aligned neatly with Huber’s body. Rittenhouse gets off a shot apparently center mass. Huber lets go of the rifle, drops the skateboard, staggers four steps, and collapses.

During the two Engagements Rittenhouse was presented with a series of “shoot/no-shoot” situations. While it is difficult to be certain about the number of shots fired by Rittenhouse in the first Engagement, as near as I can tell he fired his weapon only when cornered or on the verge of being in a close physical contest with assailants larger and apparently stronger than himself. If anything he seems to have been too hesitant to fire in the first encounter. Absent a headshot at extreme close/near contact range (a very low probability shot in intense CQB) Rittenhouse likely would have been overcome by prison-hardened and clearly aggressively disposed Short Bald Subject.

…Don’t rely on firearm discharges or pointing to deter opponents determined to close distance with you.

Not that you needed reminding, but rifle stopping power is far superior to handgun stopping power. All three subjects Rittenhouse scored clear hits on were out of the fight immediately. One (Grosskreutz) melted down even though he had ample means to continue the fight. Grosskreutz is only alive today because of Rittenhouse’s amazing (perhaps even naive) restraint. I don’t know of any tactical instructor that wouldn’t counsel a follow-up shot to center mass on Grosskreutz immediately after the arm-strike.

If attacking an individual armed with a firearm do not flinch no matter what. If you commit to grappling with a rifle or pistol holder you have to see your attack through. Four larger, assailants, one armed with a blunt instrument (skateboard) and one with a handgun were unable to subdue a nearly prone Rittenhouse because they shied from the muzzle blast at key moments. Had Grosswreutz followed through with his initial charge after the fatal center mass hit on Huber, Rittenhouse would likely have been subdued.

RTWT AT The Kenosha Shootings / Kyle Rittenhouse: A Tactical and Legal Analysis: UPDATED: 1st Shooter ID’d? – AR15.COM

[HT: ghostsniper]

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Boat Guy September 1, 2020, 2:44 PM

    Good piece. Agree with the primary authors analysis.
    Reading law is always a PITA, looks like the case against Rittenhouse is fairly weak; which doesn’t mean much.
    Speaks volumes about our Country that Rittenhouse is incarcerated and the Portland murderer is at large, despite being ID’d

  • Senhorbotero September 1, 2020, 3:55 PM

    Interesting analysis. Opened my eyes to a possibility here. These riots are not about George Floyd, this is a bunch of criminals taking their revenge on the police that had caught them at least once and put them in prison. This is a bunch of thugs, ranging from anger over speeding tickets to outright felonies using this to wage war against their Legal pursuers.

  • azlibertarian September 1, 2020, 4:06 PM

    …Speaks volumes about our Country that Rittenhouse is incarcerated and the Portland murderer is at large, despite being ID’d.”

    We’re not there yet, but if this keeps up, the “Normals” are going to adopt the tactics of the Left. The Rule of Law has to mean something. We can still make it so, but the trend is against us. When it becomes clear that we no longer have a fair and unbiased administration of the law, the Right will begin “de-arresting” their comrades, and hiding those who commit what in normal times would be a clear-cut crime. That won’t be good for anyone.

  • Kevin in PA September 1, 2020, 4:10 PM

    I just finished the whole thing. Very thorough break down of the action and thoughtful analysis.

    Ah, Sen, I would argue that this is far more than just criminals seeking revenge and you can bet your last dollar that this has nothing to do with G. Floyd. Many of these characters are being revealed as professional agitators. They are being hired to cause trouble. All those million$$$ of dollar$$$ taken in from donation to BLM and Antifa have been funneled to the appropriate groups of rabble-rousers. Their job is to cause as much trouble before the election in hopes of a Trump defeat. I don’t see that happening, but these idiots think this way.

    I think the country is going to need a lot more young men like Kyle to quell this shit-show.

  • Dank September 1, 2020, 5:00 PM

    Ol’ Remus was right. “Avoid crowds.”

  • Snakepit Kansas September 1, 2020, 6:29 PM

    I got lit up a week or so ago for being hard on Rittenhouse. Many facts were not known at that point and I still think that young man unnecessarily put himself in harms way, parading around with a rifle and acting as first aid for rioters. I learned later that he was defending some business/personal property. That I respect. Falling out of formation with your fire team and wading into the filth to help someone who ODd or stubbed their toe, turned him into a target. Remus would not approve.

    Looks like he killed a couple lifelong criminals/POS and that alone is socially a good thing. Try to club someone using your skateboard against a dude armed with an AR15, and that is how you unexpectedly go meet Jesus.

    Rittenhouse successfully faced the elephant. I’ll tip my hat to that!

  • Dave J September 2, 2020, 3:59 AM

    Good example of how important a sling can be in CQB. It will be interesting to follow how this proceeds in these times of selective law enforcement.

  • Senhorbotero September 2, 2020, 7:17 AM

    Kevin, I totally agree with you. My comment was a hasty one and too one dimensional. There is no doubt that these riots are much more then vengeful criminals and George Floyd act-ups.

  • Kevin Shaughan Dickson September 2, 2020, 7:49 AM

    Great piece of analysis.

  • Marion Gordon Stinnett September 2, 2020, 1:31 PM

    Dang. A very interesting read. Of course, as we have seen in Minnesota, facts on the ground do not deter prosecutors from ramping up charges.