≡ Menu

George Orwell: In Front of Your Nose

There must certainly be many people who are capable of holding these totally contradictory ideas in their heads at a single moment.

Medically, I believe, this manner of thinking is called schizophrenia: at any rate, it is the power of holding simultaneously two beliefs that cancel out. Closely allied to it is the power of igniting facts that are obvious and unalterable, and which will have to be faced sooner or later. It is especially in our political thinking that these vices flourish. Let me take a few sample subjects out of the hat. They have no organic connexion with each other: they are merely cased, taken almost at random, of plain, unmistakable facts being shirked by people who in another part of their mind are aware of those facts.

Hong Kong. For years before the war, everyone with knowledge of Far Eastern conditions knew that our position in Hong Kong was untenable and that we should lose it as soon as a major war started. This knowledge, however, was intolerable, and government after government continued to cling to Hong Kong instead of giving it back to the Chinese. Fresh troops were even pushed into it, with the certainty that they would be uselessly taken prisoner, a few weeks before the Japanese attack began. The war came, and Hong Kong promptly fell — as everyone had known all along that it would do.

The UN In order to have any efficacy, a world organization must be able to override big states as well as small ones. It must have the power to inspect and limit armaments, which means that its officials must have access to every square inch of every country. It must also have at its disposal an armed force bigger than any other armed force and responsible only to the organization itself. The two or three great states that really matter have never even pretended to agree to any of these conditions, and they have so arranged the constitution of the UN that their own actions cannot even be discussed. In other words, the UN’s usefulness as an instrument of world peace is nil. This was just as obvious before it began functioning as it is now. Yet only a few months ago millions of well-informed people believed that it was going to be a success.

There is no use in multiplying examples. The point is that we are all capable of believing things that we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.

When one looks at the all-prevailing schizophrenia of democratic societies, the lies that have to be told for vote-catching purposes, the silence about major issues, the distortions of the press, it is tempting to believe that in totalitarian countries there is less humbug, more facing of the facts. There, at least, the ruling groups are not dependent on popular favor and can utter the truth crudely and brutally. Goering could say ‘Guns before butter’, while his democratic opposite numbers had to wrap the same sentiment up in hundreds of hypocritical words.

The avoidance of reality is much the same everywhere and has much the same consequences. The Russian people were taught for years that they were better off than everybody else, and propaganda posters showed Russian families sitting down to abundant meal while the proletariat of other countries starved in the gutter. Meanwhile the workers in the western countries were so much better off than those of the U.S.S.R. that non-contact between Soviet citizens and outsiders had to be a guiding principle of policy. Then, as a result of the war, millions of ordinary Russians penetrated far into Europe, and when they return home the original avoidance of reality will inevitably be paid for in frictions of various kinds. The Germans and the Japanese lost the war quite largely because their rulers were unable to see facts which were plain to any dispassionate eye.

To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle. One thing that helps toward it is to keep a diary, or, at any rate, to keep some kind of record of one’s opinions about important events. [HENCE THIS BLOG — GV] Otherwise, when some particularly absurd belief is exploded by events, one may simply forget that one ever held it.

Political predictions are usually wrong. But even when one makes a correct one, discovering why one was right can be very illuminating. In general, one is only right when either wish or fear coincides with reality. If one recognizes this, one cannot, of course, get rid of one’s subjective feelings, but one can to some extent insulate them from one’s thinking and make predictions cold-bloodedly, by the book of arithmetic.

In private life, most people are fairly realistic. When one is making out one’s weekly budget, two and two invariably make four. Politics, on the other hand, is a sort of sub-atomic or non-Euclidean word where it is quite easy for the part to be greater than the whole or for two objects to be in the same place simultaneously. Hence the contradictions and absurdities I have chronicled above, are all finally traceable to a secret belief that one’s political opinions, unlike the weekly budget, will not have to be tested against solid reality.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • steveaz April 17, 2022, 5:17 PM

    “When Rhetoric does not match Reality, Revolution occurs.”
    -Ancient Chinese Proverb

  • ThisIsNotNutella April 17, 2022, 6:15 PM

    If you’ve got a nose for base (in all senses) reality and the word Thelema rings a bell, this is just for you:


    Might be easier to see things if you stare at the British Establishment full-on and then espy yours out of the corner of your eye… Slantendicular like.

    And don’t forget to donate to Nimrata Randhawa, err excuse me! Nikki Haley!

    • Fletcher Christian April 18, 2022, 1:00 PM

      Why have you posted a link to that sickening pile of anti-Semitic, racist crap?

      Britain isn’t threatened by Indian-descended ex-bankers or by Jews in particular; the fact that the banksters are a threat is because they are banksters, not because some of them are Jews. It most certainly is threatened by extremely Caucasian terrorist-huggers like Corbyn, and parasitic lawyers like his successor.

      • ThisIsNotNutella April 18, 2022, 3:22 PM

        Oh… So it’s the ‘Communists’ now, issit?

        OK Boomer. You’ve been Carefully Taught. Funny but not funny how a Pavlovian Trigger phrase/response can slam you back between the rails.

        The problem is toxic de-coupled ‘Elites’ who hold their legacy White populations in utter contempt. i.e. Rootless or Rooted Elsewhere Cosmopolitans.

        Grow a brain if it’s not too late.

  • gwbnyc April 17, 2022, 6:21 PM
  • Daniel K Day April 17, 2022, 7:41 PM

    ¶2 “Closely allied to it is the power of igniting facts” ignoring?

  • rabbit tobacco April 17, 2022, 9:35 PM

    Lives in the balance/Jackson Browne

  • Tom Hyland April 17, 2022, 9:36 PM
  • George Christiansen April 18, 2022, 5:36 AM

    “Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.
    In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.”
    – Michael Crichton (1942-2008)

    • Mike Austin April 18, 2022, 6:07 AM

      I noticed this in the mid-1970s when I began to seriously read newspapers at age 22. That began my understanding that most of what I read was nonsense. It took a few more years to realize that the lies were done on purpose and that there was a method behind them. I abandoned all newspapers and tv some 43 years ago.

      I had no idea this had a fancy name, “the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect”. Ok then.

    • KCK April 18, 2022, 6:23 AM

      Yes. Absolutely right. Reporters are whores of information, or they used to be. They were notably inept and particularly stupid. Now, add evil politics to that. Try white-dominated race riots, looting and burning, followed by the words black lives matter, and tell me that’s not bullshit level reportage.

  • KCK April 18, 2022, 6:25 AM

    I think Orwell belonged to a bygone era when thought, reason, and logic were virtues.

    • gwbnyc April 18, 2022, 6:39 AM

      as across time, practiced with notable difficulty.

      unrelated to these discussions, from the Y-not Dept:
      our boy on fascism

    • james wilson April 18, 2022, 2:28 PM

      I don’t think Orwell would be the guy to tell you that thought, reason, and logic were had much traction in his time. The last time those virtues were employed in such a way as to alter the curve of history was Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France published in 1790. Common people, clergy, the political class, and academia were all in favor of supporting the French Revolution. Burke singlehandedly changed that. One of the premier opinion makers in Britain favoring involvment with the Revolution was the perennial revolutionary Thomas Paine. George Washington was paying attention to the debate and used all his collected political currency to keep America out of the war. A little reported story.

      Don’t expect political change to come out of reason. Memes and truth bombs are the way forward. Reason is for the sharper minds at the top of the dissident movement to shape this war. Long explainations will get us no where.

      • KCK April 18, 2022, 4:33 PM

        Good stuff. Worthy of studying what you’re saying.

        Reason and logic need to begin with youth. When they’re not in a transpillic environment, they’ll have an environment of learning.

  • Sancho April 18, 2022, 7:56 AM

    NB: in the last paragraph, this:

    “Politics, on the other hand, is a sort of sub-atomic or non-Euclidean word where it is quite easy for the part to be greater than the whole or for two objects to be in the same place simultaneously.”

    should probably be:
    “…a sort of sub-atomic or non-Euclidean world…”

    • ThisIsNotNutella April 18, 2022, 3:29 PM

      “…a sort of sub-atomic or non-Euclidean world…”

      World, Word… Let’s not fuss about the small details, shall we?

      In principio erat Verbum,
      et Verbum erat apud Deum,
      et Deus erat Verbum.

      Hoc erat in principio apud Deum.

      Omnia per ipsum facta sunt:
      et sine ipso factum est nihil, quod factum est.