« There is no heat but what we can make. | Main | The Dragon of Islamic Terrorism »
December 12, 2016
"There is no credible evidence that any “hack” occurred" : Judge's Full Ruling on Stein vs Pennsylvania
Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any “hack” occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania’s voting system was not in any way compromised. Moreover, Plaintiffs’ lackof standing, the likely absence of federal jurisdiction, and Plaintiffs’ unexplained, highly prejudicial delay in seeking a recount are all fatal to their claims for immediate relief. Further, Plaintiffs have not met any of the requirements for the issuance of a mandatory emergency injunction. Finally, granting the relief Plaintiffs seek would make it impossible for the Commonwealth to certify its Presidential Electors by December 13 (as required by federal law), thus inexcusably disenfranchising some six million Pennsylvania voters. For all these reasons, I am compelled to refuse Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief. -- Stein el Al v Pedro A. Cortes
Posted by gerardvanderleun at December 12, 2016 11:31 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.
Your Say
They live in their own made-up reality, so reality doesn't make sense to them.
Thus, a fine in the amount of $1,000,000.00 must be levied for their frivolous lawsuit that wasted taxpayer resources.
Posted by: ghostsniper at December 12, 2016 1:40 PM
For a good laugh, read Judge Diamond's entire opinion. It's a model of judicial restraint and respect for federalism. It also blows Jill Stein's inane "reasoning" completely out of the water. As annoyed as he might have been to have Stein et al. bringing their frivolous case in his court, I think Judge Diamond probably enjoyed writing the opinion.
Posted by: waltj at December 14, 2016 5:46 PM