« “Have you made an herbarium yet?” | Main | The Obama Regime’s Criminal Syndicate »
May 24, 2016
There’s the great new dividing line in politics
One side is concerned solely with stability and comity at the top. The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times argue endlessly about how best to organize global governance, because that’s what matters to them. They are not just indifferent to what happens in your neighborhood. They see such concern as a fault, a mental defect that should exclude you from the halls of power. As far as they’re concerned, you are no more important than the Malaysian sweatshop worker. You’re just an economic unit.
On the other side of the dividing line are the localists, the people who focus their attention on their neighborhood, their town, their city and their country. The Super Duper Global Trade Pact may be great for Mega Corp, but if it means all the jobs in your town get shipped to Malaysia, then it is not good for you. Cheap stuff at Walmart is not much good to a man without a job. Generous welfare benefits are not much good when everyone spends it on liquor and meth.The End of Left and Right | The Z Blog
Posted by gerardvanderleun at May 24, 2016 12:04 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.
Your Say
Left and right both steal, and have all along.
The weirdest part is, most people it seems are OK with that.
Which proves the public indoctrination system is working according to plan.
Posted by: ghostsniper ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://americandigest.org/sidelines/nav-commenters.gif)
at May 24, 2016 1:44 PM
Global vs local is the wrong question, I think. Slaves to the state or self-determined is more like it.
Posted by: ahem at May 25, 2016 10:48 AM