« We're again being invited to an honest and open conversation about race, or said differently, the browbeatings will be resumed. | Main | Millennials need to put away the juice boxes and grow up »
March 24, 2016
The Pantsuit Preen is the opposite of the Gelding Preen.
This is, women seeking to elevate their social status by not appearing to be women.Maybe they cut their hair short. Again with the questions: Why? More importantly, who? As in, who likes this? Whoever that is, that’s the one with the real problem. Women are women, it’s just a fact. Women wear skirts and dresses. They look good wearing these things, and men don’t. And if your skepticism doesn’t completely ping off the charts when you see a woman wearing a pantsuit all of the time, you just haven’t been paying attention to what’s been going on lately and can’t see the calling cards. Same way it’s a fact that a man is a man, it’s also a fact that a woman is a woman. When did this become something we have to pretend is not true? What slipped? Who’s responsible? There’s the problem, those who are responsible won’t say. They just keep contributing — anonymously — to the problem. House of Eratosthenes
Posted by gerardvanderleun at March 24, 2016 9:55 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.
Your Say
When did this become something we have to pretend is not true? What slipped? Who’s responsible?
(a) In the early '80s.
(b) Situational awareness and common sense
(c) Lesbians, "feminists," and other such Social Justice Warriors who wish men to stay away from women.
Any other questions?
Posted by: Rob De Witt ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://americandigest.org/sidelines/nav-commenters.gif)
at March 24, 2016 7:56 AM