« The slave class is entirely dependent on the activities in the modern bureaucratic courts | Main | I have seen money. Felt it in my hand. »

April 19, 2015

Understanding The Fear Of Self-Defense And Revolution

The great lie being injected into the movement over the past few years is that removal of the elites will solve nothing

because the “real problem” is the corrupt nature of humanity in general and that if we remove one set of elites, they will simply be replaced with another set, as if society is fatally predisposed to develop an elitist class. This is the most vapid form of defeatist garbage ever regurgitated by nihilists. First, we have no idea whatsoever what life would be like without the globalist network because we have never lived in a society in which they have been removed, even for a single generation. I think early America after the revolution is the only example I can find of a society free from most elitist controls, and the prosperity that developed in that environment leads me to believe that removal of the entire elitist framework would result in undeniable positive changes for the world. Why else would the globalists spend the past two centuries attempting to dismantle the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
Guest Post: | Zero Hedge

Posted by gerardvanderleun at April 19, 2015 11:10 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

This is true, as far as it goes, but there's more to it than the writer is aware of or willing to admit.

The character of the people matters significantly in this equasion, and its why the founding fathers repeatedly warned that the only way a republic can survive is if its people are virtuous. This was a lesson hard learned in Rome, and we're seeing again today.

It doesn't matter how vigorously you defend the country, if the large majority of the people prefer comfort and ease over liberty. The government of a republic reflect its people, their character. So it doesn't really matter what sort of revolution you hold, all you'll get is the same or worse unless the people change at a fundamental level.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2015 10:17 AM

Unfortunately when you hire someone to watch over you you must watch over him endlessly and most people cannot be bothered, I mean, what's the point? That's why you hired him in the first place!

The only cure is to not allow someone else's fears rule you. The moment they attempt to rule you you must take matters into hand, severely and if you are unwilling to do so then what you have right now is the result.

When the founders created the chains that now bind us they should have all been killed on the spot before they left the hall.

No one gets to speak for me.

Posted by: ghostsniper [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2015 2:17 PM

Kill anybody you have to ... as soon as you need to.

Posted by: chasmatic [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 15, 2015 2:07 PM

In spite of all voices desiring otherwise, man is a social animal. From huddling in caves, fearing thunder, to huddling in cities, fearing mau-mauing minorities, people look for leaders to 'save' them from the bogyman, who actually is that bogyman.

Posted by: Vermont Woodchuck [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 20, 2015 5:41 AM

Most of us probably get along fine with people we see, in person, on a regular basis. People at a distance, that we cannot address directly in person, are a problem.

Posted by: ghostsniper [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 20, 2015 8:11 AM

Fidarsi è bene ma non fidarsi è meglio.

To trust is good but not to trust is better.

Posted by: chasmatic [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 21, 2015 12:01 AM

We're all dancing around the point of this one. We ought to be addressing the basic question which I see as: where do you draw the line and when do you use whatever force you have to keep what you have?

"... not to commit murder. You understand the distinction? Not to kill someone to take a life, but only to save my own.”

Posted by: chasmatic [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 21, 2015 8:12 AM

"because the “real problem” is the corrupt nature of humanity in general and that if we remove one set of elites, they will simply be replaced with another set, as if society is fatally predisposed to develop an elitist class."


LUKE 14

34 Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be seasoned?

35 It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill; but men cast it out. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Everything rots. The rot will always be there, trying to corrupt.
We need to continue being the salt or it all will go completely rotten.

"Here I stand; I can do no other. God help me. Amen!"
~Martin Luther

Posted by: Speller [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 21, 2015 8:50 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)