« Naked Came the Stranger | Main | Manufacturing Outrage »

March 9, 2015

This is a SecState with zero accomplishments except hiding that she has zero accomplishments.

In a further development underlining how the Clinton machine operates above the law, or off-the-books,

we now see that the pant-suited SecState had her own very private email server installed at her house. She used this system to send and receive emails, apparently including official ones, and never bothered to use a State email address. This was a blatant attempt to avoid FOIA by hiding her correspondence from official records, and, most important, to hide her disastrous actions and inactions on major events--e.g., Libya, Egypt, Benghazi, Fast and Furious--and a violation of all sorts of laws and regulations on the security of communications. This is a SecState with zero accomplishments except hiding that she has zero accomplishments. The DiploMad 2.0: The Clintons: The Same Old Tricks

Posted by gerardvanderleun at March 9, 2015 10:56 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

oasswipe has proven that accomplishments are not required for anything gov't.

Casual observation shows that everybody that works for gov't does so because they are incapable of making it in the free market.

Forced to provide for him or her self in the free market, oasswipe and hitlery would be killed in less than a week for trying to shyster the wrong person after already victimizing many others.

With people like that at the top is it any wonder there are people like the rape victims in the article below at the bottom?

Do I really have to draw that line?

jethro klintin has raped women and has never been imprisoned for it yet everyday innocent men are imprisoned for not raping women.

Jerry said it best, "What a long, strange trip it's been."

Posted by: ghostsniper [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 9, 2015 12:20 PM

Aren't we missing the really important fact. The Hillary e-mail kerfuffle was started by the NYTimes. We know, even if the NYTimes won't admit it, that the NYTimes doesn't print anything that is not the Official Party Line (i.e. what the White House and the DNC leadership decree is the Official Party Line). I.e. if the OPL is that Hillary is the Next President and the election is only a trivial formality, the NYTimes would not be bombing Hillary.

The question is who ordered the hit on Hillary, and why did they order it?

My conjecture is that Obama (a/k/a Valerie Jarret) ordered the hit because [s]he is afraid that Hillary will, in order to protect her relationship with big donors and her electability, begin to undermine him, especially on the Iran Nuclear Cave In. Obama also wants to make sure there is enough time for a Democrat presidential candidate who demonstrates fealty to Obama and his Greatness, to arise before Hillary sews up the nomination.

Posted by: Fat Man [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 9, 2015 1:56 PM

I agree Fat Man. Hillary and the other Clintons never swore fealty to Obama. I wonder where Obama would end up if it became a Blacks against Whites election? Those Southern Dems can still crack a whip.

From Breitbart:

"In 2008, during that contentious Democrat primary that pitted Hillary Clinton against Barack Obama, the former president was in full sales mode to get his wife the nomination of the Democrat Party. In an effort to enlist Ted Kennedy to his cause he uttered what any journalist would immediately brand as a racist remark.

According to Ryan Lizza of The New Yorker, Clinton said, “A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”

And this wasn’t a rare misstep for Clinton. Former President Clinton also said, according to the famed bestseller Game Change, “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee … the only reason you are endorsing him is because he’s black. Let’s just be clear.”

Posted by: chasmatic [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 9, 2015 10:14 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)