The Top 40

Justification

We have no problem executing a heinous killer, baby raper, mass murderer, so forth; we have no problem killing an unborn child in mother's womb in the last trimester of pregnancy;

we have no problem carrying a concealed weapon or having a weapon in the home to stop a threat to life and limb which usually leaves the perpetrator dead.

We have a problem, it seems, waging war on a radically psychopathic ethnic group that has killed, raped, maimed, enslaved, brainwashed and destroyed other people since oh, about 1200AD.

We have a problem administering the kind of military actions that will be decisive in eliminating the threat. Think: Dresden, no problem there. Think: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, no problem there.

We have a problem over-reacting to the situation the way we did at Waco and the Branch Davidian compound, the way we did at Bundy's ranch.

Folks, as unpleasant as it may appear, going against spiritual principles that I and many others espouse in Christianity, the only solution for the Muslim threat is to kill every last one of them, their families, their friends, their neighbors;
to lay waste to their crop lands and salt their wells, to destroy their buildings such that no two stones lay atop one another.

The justification, if one is needed, is that the Muslims are Evil. Whether we are spiritual or worldly, believers or atheists, young, old, gay or straight, male or female, White or Black, or any other combination of the above, the paradigm in which we all repose dictates that some things are good, some bad, and some Evil.

A number of years ago, before 9/11, Al Qaeda attempted to blow up the Kabaa. Now ISIS is threatening to do the same.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/06/30/isis-jihadists-are-planning-to-destroy-the-kaaba-in-mecca-and-kill-the-king-of-saudi-arabia/

This is why Islam is such a dead end religion. You can never, ever be too certain that you are Muslim enough. Always a more zealous Muslim comes along to take your head, and no sooner than that, someone shows up to take his. And on it goes.

You can never, ever be too certain that you are Muslim enough.

Kinda like being a liberal, ain't?

Nonsense. They'd just call everyone in the city a martyr and rebuild, venerating the location. That wouldn't destroy the religion, it would just outrage the world at a city of non combatants being wiped out. I'm not saying its a terrible idea to destroy the Kabaa and stomp on Islam until it calms down, but blowing up an entire city of people because some folks who don't even live there do awful things?

"...but blowing up an entire city of people because some folks who don't even live there do awful things?"

How come we haven't seen any Saudi hostages beheaded or burned alive?

Who builds the mosques and madrassas the world over that espouse the very same rhetoric that ISIS does?

What country's Sharia Law is the very same as what ISIS supports and enforces?

How many of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia?

ISIS is Saudi, less the posturing for oil sales.

BTW, I don't want to bomb Mecca. We should drop 10's of thousands of pigs, dogs and bibles on it so it will always be desecrated land.

tim

Herd members bickering.

I agree with you Chasmatic. Completely, entirely, 100% and so forth. I just wanna make certain that while we're gettin', we get those that are in the U.S and Europe, too. All of them with no stone unturned.

Cheap fantasy. Even the Japanese had to be nuked twice, and the Japanese had it in mind to leave a feudal past to be a player in the 20th century. Muslims want to return to the 8th. Nuking Mecca alone would just make it a shrine. Anyone who is roach free bags the garbage, cleans the counters, and sprays the perimeter regularly.

Instead of cowering and hoping that it won't happen near us we should be fire-bombing Baghdad and other concentrations of Muslim terrorists. Can't find 'em? Enlarge the target area.

every last one of them, their families, their friends, their neighbors;
to lay waste to their crop lands and salt their wells, to destroy their buildings such that no two stones lay atop one another."

We should have done it on 9/12/2001. And we should have done Medina also.

After the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, we nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It worked wonders on the Japanese character, which was almost as refractory as the Arab.

9/11 was brought to you by Saudi Arabia, not just in the form of the hijackers, but because Al-Qaeda was created and funded by the Saudi royal family.

Nuking two of their cities would have been the condign and canonical punishment. And would have saved trillions of dollars, and thousands of American lives, as we would not have needed to invade two Muslim Countries.

Mecca and Medina would have been logical candidates, because of their symbolic valency. The Sauds claim the title of protectors of the two holy mosques, they would have had to have changed that to the protectors of the two glowing holes in the ground.

I could have been talked into giving 24 hours warning to the populations of those two cities. I doubt that it would have reduced the casualties because the Muslims believe that their moon god will protect defend the cities from any attack.

Note to Euro-weenies and Leftist pansies. Yes, the leftists (would have hated the US, and denounced it. But it is better to be feared than to be loved. It would be many long years until the American homeland was attacked again.

Mr. Taylor who is clearly blinded by leftist propaganda says that: "They'd just call everyone in the city a martyr and rebuild, venerating the location."

They couldn't rebuild for several hundred years. They wouldn't be able to get within 20 miles of it. As for calling them martyrs. fine. so what?

"That wouldn't destroy the religion, it would just outrage the world at a city of non combatants being wiped out."

As for destroying Islam, it is unlikely, but it is possible. Islam's fundamental message is "Come to Islam, Come to Victory". Blowing up Mecca and Medina would make that sound very hollow.

As for outrage, which is so cheap these days, who cares? The legions of the outraged would be inert because they would be far more afraid than they would be outraged.

"but blowing up an entire city of people because some folks who don't even live there do awful things?"

It is too bad. But, the city is a symbol. Blowing it up would be a symbol. "Don't you ever dare to f*** with us." It is a good message to get out there.

We need to establish that the price of attacking the American homeland, is far too high for anyone to ever contemplate.

Why stop at Muslims? You think Africa is peaceful like you (until they force you to call for others to kill 1.3 Billion in your name )? No it isn't, 45 nukes should be a decent start.

Those damn Native Americans killed pilgrims, and now we got lots of em rounded up, I say time for others to kill them all with prejudice for me.

Did we kill every Nazi and Italian? Then let's call for others to finish the job for us now.

Mexico lets in drugs to America, let's MOAB every living thing within 100 miles of our border, and by "let's" we mean "have other people do for me."

This would save us SO much money, why doesn't everyone have my balls to call for others to do this for me? Why don't people take me seriously????

No matter, when I smote the ruins, I will be smiling at my prescience and laughing at the pacifists' dead bodies stinkin' up the whole joint.

Denver Window: You talk like a sausage.

He does talk like a sausage!

But, no one in this generation will do what it would take. I don't believe it. I think we are facing a pretty bad future unless the real G*d ends it at a time of his choosing.

Blowing up Mecca will destroy a meteorite. That is what is in the Kaaba. Allah's left nut or something like that.

In 1204 Pope Innocent III commissioned Arnaud (or Arnau) Amalric (died 1225), a Cistercian abbot, papal legate and inquisitor and tasked Amalric with the Albigensian Crusade. Cistercian friar, Caesar of Heisterbach wrote that, Amalric, when asked by a Crusader how to distinguish the Cathars from the Catholics, answered:

"Caedite eos! Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius"

"Kill everybody! Surely the Lord knows who are his".

There is more than one holy Islamic city. There's also Medina. We should nuke that one for no reason. Then tell them, "Watch it, chumps. Don't piss us off! Mecca is next."

I can dream, can't I?

But when I wake up I'll probably hear on the news that Obama has surrendered to ISIS.

pbird: Bingo, King Kong talk, Shirley Temple ass to back it up.

We need Means, Motive, and Opportunity.

Means: we still have a capable war machine;

Opportunity: next time an atrocity big or small is committed;

Motive: um, no. Not with the weenies in DC and all the warm and fuzzy commies in our country.

If 9-11 happened today we'd uh, we'd er, um, glower at them real good.