« Most gunfights happen within 20'. | Main | We have an immediate opening for a world-class OUTRAGE OPTIMIZATION EXPERT »

June 2, 2014

Benghazi worries so many Hillary supporters

because there is nothing to balance it against.
There is no, "But look at all the good she did." Hillary didn't do any good. She didn't do much of anything except tour countries and pose for photos. As a Secretary of State she made a perfectly adequate First Lady. Obama talks the teleprompter talk, but when you look at the results they're universally awful.
Sultan Knish: The Post-Achievement Politics of Obama and Hillary
obama-hillary-interview_510x283.jpg

Posted by gerardvanderleun at June 2, 2014 4:54 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

Trying to find anything of merit in Obama's past, present and future is futile. Same with Hillary. Her one accomplishment was to be First Lady for eight years, and that didn't work very well for her.

Anybody that attempts to analyze current politics in terms of Democrats and Republicans needs a paradigm shift. Contemplating who the Dems will run and whom the Repubs will put up as opposition is also futile. The two-party system is dead.

Blow wise to this: we are past a voters/electoral votes, people's will and best person wins framework. The Democrats will not give up the White House and Congress, not to mention all the bureaucracies and agencies. They will stick Hillary up there and she will garner fifty-one per cent of the votes same as Obama did.

Consider the similarities: both have obscure political pasts, come from nowhere with no qualifications, have no victories and accomplishments to validate them. He rides on his race, she on her gender.

The Democrats have employed Alinsky's rules with much success. Low information voters, ballot frauds, buying votes with food stamps and free phones, all it takes is 51% and watch, they will get it.

I mentioned that the Democrats will not give up the White House &c. Not if the opposition merely asks, or attempts to vote 'em out. The only way to rid DC of all the corruption and greed and abuse of power and Constitution bending will be with a political intervention.

(With help from Encyclopedia Britannica):

coup d’état, also called Coup, is the sudden, violent overthrow of an existing government by a small group. The chief prerequisite for a coup is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements. Unlike a revolution, which is usually achieved by large numbers of people working for basic social, economic, and political change, a coup is a change in power from the top that merely results in the abrupt replacement of leading government personnel. A coup rarely alters a nation’s fundamental social and economic policies, nor does it significantly redistribute power among competing political groups. Among the earliest modern coups were those in which Napoleon overthrew the Directory on Nov. 9, 1799 (18 Brumaire), and in which Louis Napoleon dissolved the assembly of France’s Second Republic in 1851. Coups were a regular occurrence in various Latin American nations in the 19th and 20th centuries and in Africa after the countries there gained independence in the 1960s.

Not with paper ballots, with boots and steel.

Posted by: chasmatic at June 2, 2014 11:46 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)