« What Changed? #327 | Main | 1980: How Jack Nicholson became The Joker »

May 5, 2014

What Was the Benghazi Cover-Up All About? — Victor Davis Hanson

2) Blaming the filmmaker offered liberals the chance
to affirm that reactionaries and bigots are the source of much of the world’s troubles. Therefore, jailing Mr. Nakoula was loud validation of the Obama Administration’s progressive, multicultural bona fides, and proof that Obama has zero tolerance for such “hate speech.”
| Ricochet

Posted by gerardvanderleun at May 5, 2014 9:11 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

The Benghazi Cover-up allowed Leftists to affirm that movies, actors, and producers are most important agents of change.

By asserting that movie caused violence against the USA, they affirm that their constituencies of the shallow are the prime movers in international politics

Posted by: ErisGuy at May 5, 2014 12:50 PM

We have at least two generations of persons who are essentially glued so to speak, to their televisions and Hollywood movies. These goons are believers in whatever is shown or stated by the media. Totally devoid of any questioning or checking of the facts period.

They are drones. Controlled by the government/media/fascist system.

If one grows a beard, they all attempt to grow a beard. If one believes the hysteria of climate/global warming, they all do. No questions asked. The perfect "Modern Man" as per Adolf Hitler.

We supposedly have an army of some 120,000 of these goons in the Obozo private brigades within the cover of the BLM, USFS, IRS, NSA, NASA, and who knows what other "agencies".

Give these goons an order, they follow the order. No questions or conscience enters the goons brain. Brown shirts? I don't know. They do wear flak jackets around these parts however. Must be to protect themselves from falling pine cones.

Posted by: Terry at May 5, 2014 1:31 PM

Terry: 120,000 goons will be no match for freedom fighters. 4GW and non-linear warfare will serve us well.

Posted by: chasmatic at May 5, 2014 11:09 PM

It was 99% about just damage control and getting reelected. An objective or even slightly less totally in the tank press would have sunk the Obama presidency with any real coverage of the story. Totally destroyed it.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 6, 2014 11:30 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)