« Should We Destroy Our Last Living Samples of the Virus That Causes Smallpox? | Main | If you are a member of the Cult of Modern Liberalism, »

May 5, 2014

I’m skeptical about Cankles winning on the Democrat side.

She angered the hard core fanatics back
in the 1990′s and never went through the proper self-criticism sessions as part of their rehabilitation ritual. It’s what gave Obama the opening. The Democrats have nominated some hilarious losers, but a maladroit clodhopper like Obama normally would have been just a sideshow. Hatred of Hillary gave Obama a stage. Things have not changed much and I can see a similar dynamic unfolding with Fake Indian.
› Bush Versus Clinton II, The Final Reckoning

Posted by gerardvanderleun at May 5, 2014 9:04 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

"Cankles"? I prefer "Bossy McPantsuit".

Posted by: Mumblix Grumph at May 5, 2014 10:09 PM

So are choice is between two socialist political families? Both of these families are often seen together around the world?
What is the different between the two parties again?

Posted by: The P at May 6, 2014 8:02 AM

I keep reading that Ms Clinton doesn't really like running for office, just the power. She's not a very good candidate, even with the Clinton machine and her estranged husband's expert advice.

The focus on Hillary! is kind of a blind: what else do they have? Fauxcahontas? Choo Choo Biden? In the end it doesn't matter, the Dem wins, but they don't have anyone to get excited about.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 6, 2014 8:13 AM

Isn't that ShrubII vs. ClintonII?

Clinton needs to appear to be running to keep the money flowing to the Foundations. That's why, once Hillary is truly past her sell-by date, we'll be blessed with Chelsea 24/7 carrying the family flag.

Yes CT...the Democrat party, the party of youth...

Biden 74

Hillary 68

Fauxahontas 66

Posted by: Soviet of Washington at May 6, 2014 10:59 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)