May 5, 2014
I’m skeptical about Cankles winning on the Democrat side.She angered the hard core fanatics back
in the 1990′s and never went through the proper self-criticism sessions as part of their rehabilitation ritual. It’s what gave Obama the opening. The Democrats have nominated some hilarious losers, but a maladroit clodhopper like Obama normally would have been just a sideshow. Hatred of Hillary gave Obama a stage. Things have not changed much and I can see a similar dynamic unfolding with Fake Indian.› Bush Versus Clinton II, The Final Reckoning
Posted by gerardvanderleun at May 5, 2014 9:04 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.
"Cankles"? I prefer "Bossy McPantsuit".
Posted by: Mumblix Grumph at May 5, 2014 10:09 PM
So are choice is between two socialist political families? Both of these families are often seen together around the world?
What is the different between the two parties again?
Posted by: The P at May 6, 2014 8:02 AM
I keep reading that Ms Clinton doesn't really like running for office, just the power. She's not a very good candidate, even with the Clinton machine and her estranged husband's expert advice.
The focus on Hillary! is kind of a blind: what else do they have? Fauxcahontas? Choo Choo Biden? In the end it doesn't matter, the Dem wins, but they don't have anyone to get excited about.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 6, 2014 8:13 AM
Isn't that ShrubII vs. ClintonII?
Clinton needs to appear to be running to keep the money flowing to the Foundations. That's why, once Hillary is truly past her sell-by date, we'll be blessed with Chelsea 24/7 carrying the family flag.
Yes CT...the Democrat party, the party of youth...
Posted by: Soviet of Washington at May 6, 2014 10:59 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)