« 6 million shares of SPY, times $0.0001, equals … hmm … $600. | Main | "Street toughs are easy to co-opt for different causes, because they have no ideology." »

September 15, 2012

Translating the Times

Today’s lead New York Times article, “Anti-American Protests Flare Beyond the Mideast” (meaning that they have spread throughout the entire Muslim world),
makes it uncomfortably clear that we share this globe with a 1.7 billion strong religious community which is liable at the drop of a hat to erupt in global savagery. The events confirm what I have been saying since September 11, 2001: that Islam is incompatible with non-Muslim mankind, and that Muslims should therefore be separated and quarantined from non-Muslim mankind. -- Muslim mobs wreak havoc on Western embassies and properties throughout Muslim world

Posted by Vanderleun at September 15, 2012 8:32 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

Thank goodness we are not Dhimmi's in a world ruled by Islamists. Otherwise we would suffer the fate of the Copts (who were once the majority) in egypt - even though they were the vast majority.

Anohter manufactured 'outrage' by Islamists. ho hum.

Posted by: Cond0011 at September 15, 2012 9:36 AM

Be Outraged! Join the Free Sh*t Army!

Posted by: cond0011 at September 15, 2012 10:26 AM

I disagree with the sttement that muslims should be separated from the civilized world. No, what should happen is that their population is decimated - in the original sense of the word. Then, they should be given a chance to extend religious tolerance to others. If they do not, decimate their remaining population. Lather, rinse, repeat until they get the message and they can be forced out of the 7th century and welcomed into the 21st century.

Posted by: Ogrrre at September 15, 2012 10:57 AM

I work with a young man from Ghana. He said that the Muhammadan population there is about 10%. He said "they are very difficult to live with", that "they want to fight at the slightest provocation" and that "the best thing to do is to avoid them".

Posted by: mjazz at September 15, 2012 12:33 PM

It is easy to enrage ignorant people, that is why religion and political parties are so useful to leaders.

Posted by: Mike at September 15, 2012 3:28 PM

As long as the civilized world allows Muslims to remain on the sidelines of Islam's war against all they will. If the Bloods and Crips were fighting in your neighborhood you would stay indoors and hope someone does something. The problem is Muslim communities outside of majority Muslim nations provide a reservoir of support/concealment/intelligence for whatever number of "radical" Muslims want to operate in our midst.

If the Muslim diaspora were forced back into Crapistan either the more moderate Muslims would defeat or temper the "radical" or use their experience in the West to improve their local area. That is up to the Muslims, and I don't assume the people that have cooperated just enough to remain as backward as possible will make great strides, whatever.

We can't read their minds, but we can do much better at reading their passport. Deport Islam and then melt any trouble spot in Crapistan, plus a random other trouble spot to prevent one tribal leader staging events to bring punishment on his rival tribal leader.

80% of mosques in the US are funded by radicals terrorist funding sources.Deport them. If they won't cooperate and be deported, take them to the beaches and push them into the water. What they do after that is up to them.

Nobody must be allowed to remain on the sidelines, not with regard to Muslims, the media, or socialism. Those "moderate" people that feel happy to assume they can't know if these groups are being used to wage war against the US are the problem. There is vast ammounts of information to confirm these and other groups are waging war. Failure to reach the conclusion is willful and allows these groups to continue with their efforts.

If the Muslims want to renounce their "strict" interpretation, I'd support them staying on a trial basis. But they would need to evidence their change by protecting minority rights in their home lands and funding widespread building of churches and temples for their minority population. The burden must be on them to prove they are worthy, all ambiguity must be interpreted as danger. If you aren't willing to deport them you are endangering the rest of us. You have no right to that idea in the face of our experience. Nowhere do Muslims improve local conditions with increasing numbers, nowhere. They made their Crapistan, they deserve to be there.

Posted by: Scott M at September 15, 2012 7:13 PM

You mean the Muslim world as in Europe and Australia, right?

Posted by: Jewel at September 16, 2012 8:36 AM

Moslems erupt at the slightest hint of a slight towards Mohammed because they hate and despise him for trapping them in abject misery.

https://twitter.com/OneLaneHwy/status/247751483351781376

Posted by: ELC at September 18, 2012 6:14 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)