The Top 40

Well then, the explanation just changes from "the far right did it" to the "far right caused the jihadi to do it."

Q: how do you distinguish between a peaceful assimilated Muslim from a pre-violent jihadi scheduled to attack an elementary school next Tuesday at 10:30?

A: Neither do I.

Here's the distinction: A pre-violent jihadi is dead; a peaceful assimilated Muslim is a MSM piece of fantasy.

Peccable...I'm sure there are peaceful assimilated Muslims out there.

But if they ever have to choose sides with either the head-choppers or the West, many will choose the choppers. A lot more than most realize.

That is impossible. According to Islam, one must adhere to Islamic teaching or be an apostate.

How many peaceful assimilated Muslims actively protest,vociferously condemn the actions of the "pre-violent jihadis"? CAIR, Pan-Islam? Anyone?

Notice al Azhar University, nor other prominent Muslim scholars, issue a fatwa denying proper Muslim burial to spree killers in the name of Islam.

If these animals were hijacking Islam the mullahs and imams would make it clear everywhere such filthy pigs would be going to hell and bring shame to their families. That's not happening for a reason.

Once they are "peacefully assimilated", aren't they supposed to be buried? (wrapping in pig skin optional, but recommended) PS. Allah is just "God" in arabic. Muhamed is Satan posing as a prophet, albeit false, to lure souls to Hell.
Never Forget. Ephesians 6:10-17

Also not always a good idea to acpcet homosexuals into the army, because they bunk in the same bunkhouse with other men. The sexual dynamic would be the same if hetero men would bunk with hetero women in the army. Political corrections has made a mess of everything everywhere.It probably depends on the psychological profile of each individual, but recall the soldier Bradley Manning who engaged in treason and passed classified info to Wikileaks? He was Gay, and the explanation he gave for his treasonous act was because he had a nasty breakup with his boyfriend! He took out his failure at love on the military and jeopardized the security of many people. But the military had done nothing to hurt him, it's simply that the sexual dynamic for such individuals in these situations is all wrong -- it clouds their judgement. That's why intelligence agencies refused to employ homosexuals for many years -- not because the agencies were "homophobic" but because Gays presented security risks, were often blackmailed to work for enemy agents, etc. All five Government spies in the infamous "Cambridge Five" British spy ring were homosexual. "Don't ask, don't tell" was designed to keep people's minds on the job at hand instead of "hand jobs". It's all just plain common sense. Likewise, why would you send a fundamentalist Muslim to fight other Muslims? Cleary a security risk.