« Ads That Make You Look for the "Never Click" Option | Main | And the 3 Remaining Reasons for ObamaCare Are: »
January 19, 2010
Oh, Snap!
The sulking's starting early in the Aspergers-addled brain of Charles Johnson Massachusetts Prepares to Drink the Tea "Anybody want to talk about Coakley vs. Brown? [Sigh.] It’s looking like right wing tea party candidate Scott Brown will ride to victory on a wave of Fox News-fueled populist anger." Aww, poor widdle puddy-tat. That's the kind of cutting-edge analysis reptiles have come to expect.Posted by Vanderleun at January 19, 2010 11:47 AM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.
Your Say
"Fox News-fueled populist anger"
. . . as opposed to Johnson's level-headed, emotionally-nuetral style of politics. I was away when he flipped; what the heck happened?
Posted by: Cameron Wood at January 19, 2010 12:52 PM
Who's Charles Johnson.
Posted by: Ricky Raccoon at January 19, 2010 2:02 PM
He came out of liberal closet, Cameron, and banned anyone who might disagree with him ever so slightly. He also banned people from being able to click through links to his site that were posted on addresses of the Banned.
Now we make fun of him because not to make fun of him is to waste a good opportunity to make fun of him.
Posted by: Jewel at January 19, 2010 4:45 PM
I took a look over at little green goofballs the other day. What a sad ass wreck of a site it has become: ugly, cluttered, crawling with ads- posts ridiculing global warming deniers, and Sarah Palin supporters. And the comments section is an ongoing contest to see who can agree best with the Master. And to think that place used to be the wild west of the internet...
Knowing the colossal paranoid ego of teh chuck, I do not doubt for a minute that he'll find this side-note entry, and peruse the comments. Here's a suggestion, lizard boy- take the seat off your ten-speed, and insert the post up your spandex covered fanny. Use the blue grease.
JWM
Posted by: jwm at January 19, 2010 6:57 PM
As an Asperger's sufferer myself, I resent the implication that I am anything like Charles Johnson.
Posted by: Jake Was Here at January 19, 2010 7:07 PM
Oh the site will fade and wear away to less than nothing. All it will take is a little more time.
Posted by: vanderleun at January 19, 2010 8:07 PM
Man. You miss a LOT when you ditch the blogosphere for a couple of years.
Posted by: Cameron Wood at January 19, 2010 11:21 PM
Johnson readers went dhimmi along with their imam.
Posted by: Sadie at January 20, 2010 6:33 AM
"Now we make fun of him because not to make fun of him is to waste a good opportunity to make fun of him."
Of course tragedy is essence of humor. And boy what a tragedy it's been watching Johnson. What a shame. He just tossed his character, his wealth of self, for a buck. The mirror must be tough on him. Keep up the great fun. It was his decision of course...to our benefit of laughter.
Posted by: unrealizedviewpoint at January 20, 2010 9:10 AM
I still can't determine which kind of bankruptcy was responsible for the descent -- moral, intellectual, spiritual, or financial.
Posted by: Gagdad Bob at January 20, 2010 9:33 AM
Gagster: How about sexual as well? More than one ex-lizard has speculated that ol' Chazz fell for some leftist tart, and that she pressured him back to his pre-9/11 politics.
Posted by: Aquila at January 20, 2010 9:52 AM
Asperger's sufferers do not suffer from Asperger's. Others may.
Posted by: james wilson at January 20, 2010 9:52 AM
"I still can't determine which kind of bankruptcy was responsible for the descent -- moral, intellectual, spiritual, or financial."
It was all four led by financial. Depend upon it.
Posted by: vanderleun at January 20, 2010 10:32 AM
It's not Aspergers Gerard, he's just a jerk.
Posted by: Alan at January 20, 2010 8:26 PM
Some comic book rewrite artist you posted on your site thought the slavering sycophantic poster called "Sharmuta" might be his new squeeze...or door mat, I forget which.
Posted by: Jewel at January 21, 2010 5:16 AM
"...moral, intellectual, spiritual, or financial"
It appears Sir Charles has met his personal four horsemen.
Posted by: Susan in Seattle at January 22, 2010 6:55 PM
The New York Times opines or something:
Posted by: Jewel at January 23, 2010 1:03 AM