« Flight 253 hero Schuringa to be prosecuted | Main | Daphne's Forming Up an Anarchistic Band of Pistoleros Down Texas Way. Be There or.... »
December 29, 2009
In Which, Again, the Commenters Are Smarter Than The New York Times Reporters
"The mistake is looking too hard for the bombs and not hard enough for the bombers." -- Obama Is Told of Signs That Should Have Grounded Plot - Readers' Comments - NYTimes.com
Posted by Vanderleun at December 29, 2009 6:50 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.
Your Say
It's the liberal shell game. This time they are saying "no, not the bombs, it's the bombers to worry about." Prior to that it was required we ignore the likely suspects (no profiling of Arab men with one-way tickets and no luggage) and "get to the root causes.
The one principle liberals use during an argument is they wanted the other thing, even if they have spent their career arguing against that other thing until now. In this sense they are like your ex-wife. Whatever you did, even if it was doing what she asked, you were wrong and you should have done the other thing.
If you haven't punched a liberal today the terrorists will have won.
Posted by: Scott M at December 29, 2009 8:57 PM