« That Old Bible, Meryl Street | Main | And now for a lie so large it could fill the Grand Canyon with drool »

September 1, 2009

Megan McArdle Schools Michelle Goldberg

Watch Michelle Goldberg's face as McArdle decimates her argument.

HT: Moe Lane who noted "Megan McArdle’s moment of supreme awesomeness."

Posted by Vanderleun at September 1, 2009 11:38 PM. This is an entry on the sideblog of American Digest: Check it out.

Your Say

This is an awesome video, however, the lady that was dissected will tomorrow make the same misguided point and receive praise from her liberal friends for making the point.

Liberals are like conspiracy theorists. Even if they spend a lifetime making one point and even build an identity on that one point, when it's debunked they just drop that point and make a backup point. Once the debunker is safely out of sight they return to telling you how their original point proves the conspiracy is true.

Liberals don't arrive at their ideas through argument and analysis. Liberalism is a childish wish for a utopian ideal and the liberals around them just reinforce the ideal and insult the people that don't already believe in the ideal.

Do liberals believe in socialism and welfare because they work so well, or because liberals want to believe they work despite their failure every time they are impemented? When welfare was reformed and 70% of the recipients got jobs, did the liberals end their dream of unlimited welfare or did they just wait for President Zero's first piece of legislation and reintroduce the old-style welfare? Liberals have an immunity system against facts, even obvious facts.

Posted by: Scott M at September 2, 2009 2:05 AM

Yea but Scott, everything you say it true, ya' gott'a admit it was fun watching her twist in the wind.

Posted by: tim at September 2, 2009 12:36 PM

Yes, Tim. It was delicious.

But liberals aren't influenced by losing arguments. They can lose them 24/7 for a lifetime and they will conclude it's narrow-minded to focus on the facts. This is why the invented deconstructionism and worship Chomsky, both with the purpose of redefining simple terms to expand them into fuller definitions which obscure their clearly losing arguments.

Posted by: Scott M at September 2, 2009 12:44 PM

Scott, she didn't even wait until tomorrow... If you follow the link to the rest of the clip, Michelle starts to quibble almost immediately after saying, "No.. ".

Posted by: Rich N at September 2, 2009 12:55 PM

Goldberg is cute though, in a kind of fluff-headed, charming way. I find her physically attractive.

McCardle is definitely attractive in my book, an attractiveness that's reinforced by her intelligence. I think I'm in lust with both of them. I love girlfights, even intellectual ones.

Ooh, I'm sorry, was that OT and innapropriate?

hee hee

Posted by: Roderick Reilly at September 2, 2009 2:54 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)