November 10, 2003

Wondering About Wesley


Our New National Nightmare

The entry below set me to thinking about the Clark Campaign. Only a bit since, as currently constituted, the campaign does not require a lot of thought.

Still something occurs to me that I don't have the answer for and I'm wondering if anyone else does.

Question: Can Wesley Clark, after setting up his campaign machine -- volunteers, blogs, media appearances, money-raising mechanisms, all the bells and whistles of a campaign -- can Clark then decide to withdraw and hand over his support and campaing machinery to a new candidate? A previously unannounced candidate? A candidate with no visible electoral machine but a lot of Democratic support? A candidate like the distinguished senator from New York?

Posted by Vanderleun at November 10, 2003 11:25 AM
Bookmark and Share

Comments:

HOME

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

I believe that it would be possible and not unprecedented for a candidate to take his supporters, organization, etc. and transfer it to another candidate. That is what generally happens as the field narrows. I don't think funds could be transferred, but after McCain-Feingold, who would know?

Posted by: Jamie at November 10, 2003 3:48 PM

I'm not sure, but I suspect the funds could be transferred if the transferring candidate were also on the ticket. (Trans.: "Clinton/Clark 2004!!!!")

But Gerard, didn't you read whoever the hell it was - I can't remember - who speculated when Clark threw his hat in the ring, complete with a Bill endorsement, that this was what was actually going on? Clark builds a political organization, while Hilary gets time to look at how the numbers are shaping up closer to the election. If Bush looks beatable later on, she swoops in and takes over the campaign, with Clark getting the veep spot. If not, she doesn't, and Clark gets to have his campaign built with the help of Bill and friends. A win-win situation for both.

Posted by: jaed at November 12, 2003 5:15 PM

Ahaha. Get over it neocons. You guys are the only ones cheering for Hillary to run. She's not going to do it. Face facts.

Posted by: CLM at November 14, 2003 12:26 PM

To help you become a good Aqua citizen, Apple has created a few guidelines. I've put together a brief overview of them, and we'll be tackling many of them in the months to come.

Posted by: Samuel at January 13, 2004 4:07 AM

By building an application that takes advantage of Aqua's many facets, you help ensure that your application will not only look good, but have a chance of becoming a raging success. After a new user clicks on the icon of your program, the first thing he or she sees is the application interface. I know that when I review a product, I am very critical of its visual design. I usually have a short time to learn the new software, so design and ease of use are very important. Aside from those who marvel at the beauty of the command line, most users tend to react the same way.

Posted by: Guy at January 13, 2004 4:07 AM

Clicking an application in the dock should always bring forward an active window. If the user clicks on an open app's icon in the Dock, the application is active and all unminimized windows come along with it. I have found a few problems with windows behaving independently of their application.

Posted by: Barbara at January 13, 2004 4:07 AM

By building an application that takes advantage of Aqua's many facets, you help ensure that your application will not only look good, but have a chance of becoming a raging success. After a new user clicks on the icon of your program, the first thing he or she sees is the application interface. I know that when I review a product, I am very critical of its visual design. I usually have a short time to learn the new software, so design and ease of use are very important. Aside from those who marvel at the beauty of the command line, most users tend to react the same way.

Posted by: Alan at January 13, 2004 4:08 AM

This topic is one we will tackle later in this article, but it refers to making sure that your application and the dock aren't fighting it out for supremacy of the screen.

Posted by: Rook at January 13, 2004 4:09 AM

At WWDC, I listened to Apple representatives make some excellent points about taking the time to build a 100%-compliant Aqua application, and I think all developers need to look beyond the code and listen to what the folks at Apple have to say

Posted by: Gilbert at January 13, 2004 4:09 AM

For my Paint application, I created a series of icons to simulate a rendering algorithm. While the application is performing this CPU-intensive task, you can always see the status of the document by the icon changing in the Dock.

Posted by: Isabella at January 13, 2004 4:09 AM

Dock Animation. Sometimes animating icons in the dock can be useful in communicating the status of the system or application.

Posted by: Lancelot at January 13, 2004 4:09 AM

To help you become a good Aqua citizen, Apple has created a few guidelines. I've put together a brief overview of them, and we'll be tackling many of them in the months to come.

Posted by: Tobias at January 13, 2004 4:10 AM

This topic is one we will tackle later in this article, but it refers to making sure that your application and the dock aren't fighting it out for supremacy of the screen.

Posted by: Marian at January 13, 2004 4:10 AM