Can we please have a sensible discussion about the continued shallowing of the gene pool in America before it is too late?
Of course, doing this as a sandal would have violated the new European pedestrian-protection standard.
I think it looks "fabulous!"
Posted by: StephenB at February 24, 2006 8:35 PMLike all good metrosexual men, this one is not going to let a little thing like a noncongruence of size keep him from his Cinderella when he finally finds her. She may wear size 378XXXXX and tower over him by 17 stories, but they WILL live happily ever after. ......... Just as soon as he forgets that incredibly cute little hispanic gym rat and that great weekend in Columbus.
Posted by: AskMom at February 24, 2006 10:11 PMAt that size, he could not only live happily with her, but within her with room to redecorate. The Metrosexual's dream wife.
Posted by: Gerard Van der Leun at February 24, 2006 10:14 PMWhy "metrosexual?"
Why not "gay?"
Or whatever.
You come so close to being perceptive but then piss it away trying to prove your own masculinity. As if anyone cares.
The Manolo, what does he think of the color (and the guy's outfit)?
Posted by: Connecticut Yankee at February 25, 2006 7:43 AMI see some "Raw" projection going on here.
heh heh.
Posted by: Doug at February 25, 2006 10:09 AMI believe the man in the photo is the builder, David Crow. David lives in Seattle, drinks down the hill from Queen Anne, among his people in Fremont, and also draws attention through his Salmon BBQ grill. I am not sure if any of his activities engendered offspring.
Posted by: a small green ball at February 25, 2006 12:34 PMHey, you don't have to be gay to be metrosexual. Nor do you have to be metrosexual to be gay. I shouldn't have to tell Raw that.
Posted by: Gerard Van Der Leun at February 25, 2006 8:08 PMBut then again, in life today, we are up to our kiesters in pecksniffs.
Posted by: Gerard Van Der Leun at February 25, 2006 8:09 PM
HOME