Ooooo.... that's gonna leave a mark.
Pow, right in the kisser!
A nit to pick: the predecessor to Windows 95 was Windows 3.1, not Windows 2.
Posted by: Donald Sensing at October 24, 2009 6:52 AMGood catch on the nitpick, Rev. Sensing, but do you remember Windows 2? (Especially compared to the early Mac OS?) What an awful clunker that was!
Posted by: BobK at October 24, 2009 8:33 AMOne thing for sure about the Apple guy, he'd never be so unhip as to live past the age of 30. Or buy a tie. Or tuck his shirt in.
But he'll always have this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xgls9IwWUyU
Posted by: Rob De Witt at October 24, 2009 11:35 AMI think they were cutting MS a little slack, that Win95 wasn't so bad after Windows 3.11---of course, some of us remember Win95 had a lot of problems until Service Pack 2.
They could have gone back farther and mentioned how DOS 6 sucked after DOS 5 and DOS 4 REALLY sucked after DOS 3, but I suppose most of the market isn't old enough to remember
Posted by: Marty at October 24, 2009 6:51 PM
HOME