March 31, 2004

The 7 Defects of Highly Secular Societies

SOUND FAMILIAR?

1. Over-abstraction: the literature of the theorists routinely spoke of "differentiation," "autonomization," "privatization," and other abstract, if not abstruse, dynamics disengaged from concrete factors of social change such as interests, ideologies, institutions, and power conflicts.

2. Lack of human agency: the theory was big on process without protagonists. It depicted secularization without secularizers. According to the theory, secularization just happens.

3. Overdeterministic inevitability: "Religion's marginalization from public life is portrayed as a natural or inevitable process like cell mitosis or adolescent puberty." Secularization theory reflects a view of linear social evolution in the tradition of Comte and Spencer. "If there is one truth that history teaches us beyond doubt," wrote the great Durkheim, "it is that religion tends to embrace a smaller and smaller portion of social life." Any questions, class?

4. Idealist intellectual history: here the history of ideas is determinative. "Culture, philosophy, and intellectual systems certainly matter. But they cannot be abstracted from the real historical, social, political, legal, and institutional dynamics through which they worked and were worked upon."

5. Romanticized history: there was in the view of secularization theorists an "age of faith" --for instance, the thirteenth century -- which was succeeded and displaced by the age of reason and modernity. Then everything was religious; now everything, or at least everything that matters in public, is secular.

6. An overemphasis on religious self-destruction: Berger's 1967 The Sacred Canopy suggested that the Judeo-Christian tradition "carried the seeds of secularization within itself."

7. Underspecified causal mechanisms: "Exactly how did industrialization and immigration work to produce religious privatization? Why should we treat these as some kind of 'great gears of history' that inexorably grind their way toward religious privatization? Rather than all nodding our scholarly heads together in what could be premature analytical closure, we need to go back and force ourselves to answer these questions again."

-- -- Richard John Neuhaus, Secularization Doesn't Just Happen

Posted by Vanderleun at March 31, 2004 10:59 PM | TrackBack
Save to del.icio.us

Comments:

AMERICAN DIGEST HOME

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

One of my history professors use to say "Beware the great impersonal forces of history . . . "

By which he meant that when we wrote papers for him, that these great impersonal forces would have a detrimental effect on our grades if they appeared as part of our argument.

He said that when we encountered such arguments, they were usually threadbare when it came to facts.

Posted by: The Colossus at April 1, 2005 7:17 AM

"Theories are the filters through which facts are interpreted."

Karl Popper

Posted by: Amy at April 1, 2005 9:22 AM

This week's National Review has a great review of Jared Diamond's new book, COLLAPSE. Victor Davis Hanson takes on both of Diamond's books - the earlier one: GUNS,GERMS, AND STEEL and shreds them. The review is not perfectly germane to this post, but it fits in so many ways I'd feel remiss in not mentioning it.

Posted by: Amy at April 1, 2005 9:26 AM

"Theories are the filters through which facts are interpreted."

... and hammered on intil they fit neatly, or else are ignored.

Posted by: Justin Moser at April 3, 2005 2:05 AM
Post a comment:

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated to combat spam and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.










Remember personal info?