October 15, 2004

The Democrats and the Sign of the "L" On Their Foreheads

"Meanwhile most Americans have already quietly made up their minds"


Terrorist killing, like the first World Trade Center bombing or the USS Cole, certainly was not seen as the logical precursor to 9/11 — the expected wages of a quarter century of appeasement that started with the weak Carter response to the Iranian hostages and was followed by dead soldiers, diplomats, and tourists about every other year. No, these were "incidents" like 9/11 itself — "law-enforcement" issues that called for the DA, writs, and stern prison sentences, the sort of stuff that barristers like Kerry, Edwards, Kennedy, and McAuliffe handle so well.

This attitude is part of the therapeutic view of the present struggle that continually suggests that something we did — not the mass murdering out of the Dark Age — brought on our present bother that is now "the focus of our lives." We see this irritation with the inconvenience and sacrifice once more reemerging in the Atlantic Monthly, Harpers, and the New York Times: We, not fascists and Islamist psychopaths, are blamed for the mess in Iraq, the mess in Afghanistan, the mess on the West Bank, and the mess here at home, but never credited with the first election in 5,000 years in Afghanistan or consensual government replacing autocracy in the heart of the ancient caliphate.
....

The artists, musicians, and entertainers have also railed against the war. In the therapeutic mindset, the refinement and talent of a Sean Penn, Michael Moore, Al Franken, Bruce Springsteen, or John Fogerty earn respect when they weigh in on matters of state policy. But in the tragic view, they can be little more than puppets of inspiration. Their natural gifts are not necessarily enriched by real education or learning. Indeed, they are just as likely to be high-school or college dropouts and near illiterates, albeit with good memories, voices, and looks. The present antics of these influential millionaire entertainers should remind us why Plato banished them — worried that we might confuse the inspired creative frenzies of the artisans with some sort of empirical knowledge. But you can no more sing, or write, or act al Qaeda away than the equally sensitive novelists and intellectuals of the 1930s or 1940s could rehabilitate Stalin.

And then there are the new green billionaires who no longer worry about the struggle to make any more money, much less about state, federal, and payroll taxes that can eat up half of a person's income. A George Soros may have made his pile by trying to destroy the British financial system, but now he wishes to leave the world safe for currency traders to come by defeating George Bush. The up-from-the-bootstraps struggle to create the dough for the Heinz fortune is a century past and forgotten — thus the post-capitalist Teresa in her private jet and John Kerry on his $500,000 power boat can lecture us about Americans' shameless oil profligacy and George Bush's blood for oil gambit in Iraq. ....

Meanwhile most Americans have already quietly made up their minds. They think the Democratic party is run not by unionists, farmers, miners, truckers, and average folk, but by those rich enough not to have to make a living, and who wish out of either guilt or noblesse oblige to force the dumber upper middle class to be more sensitive, generous, or utopian. Americans also believe Europe has lost its way and is bogged down in a hopeless and soon-to-be scary task of legislating by fiat heaven on earth. We of the tragic persuasion wish them well with Turkey and their unassimilated Islamic populations, but we don't want our hurtful combat troops there after 60 years of subsidized peacekeeping. Americans also don't care much about the Nobel prizes anymore — not when a Jimmy Carter is praised after trying to undermine his own president on the eve of war, and not when the most recent peace-prize winner rants on that AIDS is a Western-created germ agent unleashed to hurt Africa but silent about $15 billion in American aid to stop what her own continent is spreading.

John Kerry is probably going to lose this election, despite the "Vote for Change" rock tour, despite Air America, despite Kitty Kelley's fraud hyped on national media, despite Soros's moveon.org hit pieces, despite Fahrenheit 9-11, despite the Nobel Prizes and Cannes Film Awards, despite Rathergate and ABC Memogate, despite the European press, despite Kofi Annan's remonstrations, despite a barking Senator Harkin or Kennedy, despite the leaks of rogue CIA Beltway insiders, despite Jimmy Carter's sanctimonious lectures, despite Joe Wilson, Anonymous, and Richard Clarke — and more. You all have given your best shot, but I think you are going to lose.

Why? Because the majority of Americans does not believe you. The majority is more likely to accept George Bush's tragic view that we really are in a war for our very survival to stop those who would kill us and to alter the landscape that produced them — a terrible war that we are winning.

When all is said and done, it still is as simple as that.


-- VDH's Private Papers::The Therapeutic Choice

Posted by Vanderleun at October 15, 2004 6:39 PM
Bookmark and Share

Comments:

HOME

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

Bravo. Succinct, compelling, and why I -- a registered Democrat -- am voting for Bush this time around.

Posted by: Bill Peschel at October 15, 2004 8:59 PM

The appeasment movement of the early 20th century found it's high-water mark among the communists of America and the fools of Europe. Millions of deaths resulted from the refusal to counter a growing military and social force, and that legacy was mirrored in the late 60's when the danger of communism was overlooked in favor of being cool.

The next stanza echos around the heads of the sensitive folk who believe that the murdered civilians of September 11th somehow "deserved what they got", and that there is now a burning need to apologize to the gentle and caring dictators of the world for our "unilateral" decisions.

Fine. Apologize all you'd like. It will make exactly NO DIFFERENCE to the outcome of this war on terror. NONE. I'll tell you what, you with your sandals and soft smiles, the souls of those lost on September 11th and the efforts of the men and women of our military who've sacrificed their present and futures deserve more than your foolishness. You go right ahead and write a poem condemming war, let's see if the Facists in Iraq are impressed. I'll vote for shooting them twice in their furry heads. Which do you think will be more effective in preventing another attack?

Dan Patterson
Winston-Salem, NC

Posted by: Dan Patterson at October 16, 2004 8:18 AM

Bill Whittle mentioned in his most recent post (circa Oct 14) that he had received 120,000 UNIQUE visits in the previous seven days. That is, people with DIFFERENT addresses connecting to his previous post, where there were approximately 500 comments from people of various points of view posted in that same period. Vanderleun, your website and others that take the time and effort to weigh and consider ideas and histories available to all of us, have served a valuable purpose. Despite the hubris of people like Chris Matthews, Halperin, Rather, McAullife, et al, there is a huge population of people that have awakened to the manipulation of news and thought that has been going on for decades.

Posts and essays such as yours, and even more importantly, the simple fact that YOU ALLOW dissenting comments, stand in stark contrast to the intellectual bankruptcy and craven gutlessness of the mis-named "Liberal" establishment that makes no attempt any more to even hide its frenzied efforts to suppress dissent and opposition. I thank you for putting so much of your time and energy into the efforts you have made.

David March, animator & fiddler

Posted by: David March, animator & fiddler at October 16, 2004 1:57 PM