June 1, 2009

Modern Love

introgirls.jpg
“I’m no yenta, but I think this is going to work." - Jim Rogers

"Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments..."

Submitted for your consideration an item most notable for its soothing palliative tone in which the unusual is normalized. As the age's intellectual insanity assumes the proportions of a plague, the experience of reading the herald of these plague years, the New York Times, becomes more and more like reading dispatches from the alternate universe of "hoping these changes stick." That the changes can only stick if the core of the more normative America holds both economically and militarily (even as the 'changy' culture struggles to destroy it) is where the hoping enters in.


Still it is an item imbued with sweetness in the coyly named "Weddings & Celebrations" section of the Times. It really has it all when it comes to the modern nature of love in a time of cultural cholera: Vows - Kate Adamick and Kay Diaz - Weddings and Celebrations - NYTimes.com

"The two women were introduced Feb. 4, 2008, via an e-mail message from their mutual friend, Jim Rogers, the New York State deputy attorney general in the social justice division, for which Ms. Diaz, 45, is a senior trial counsel....

On Valentine’s Day the women exchanged photographs. “It’s an absolute bonus she is as beautiful as she is,” Ms. Adamick said. They scheduled their first phone call four days later. Lengthy, nightly conversations ensued....

The next day Ms. Adamick flew back to New York from California. To her surprise, Ms. Diaz was waiting for her at Newark Liberty airport with two dozen roses. The connection was instantaneous. “She dropped the flowers on the ground and kissed me,” Ms. Adamick said. “We were making out in the car like two teenagers,” Ms. Diaz said. By the following morning they were engaged. 'It just came out of my mouth...' "

A little more than a year later, on May 8, the couple were legally married by Jeanne Laughlin, a Connecticut justice of the peace, in a conference room at the Stamford Government Center.

They exchanged yellow pipe-cleaner rings, saving their engraved gold bands for their public ceremony the next day, when Mr. Rogers — who had introduced them — led them through their vows in the three-story atrium of 632 on Hudson, an event space in a 19th-century New York town house.

“All my life I searched for you, but never thought I’d find you,” Ms. Adamick said. “All my life I dreamed of you, but never dreamed you were real.”

Mr. Rogers said, “You may both kiss the bride,” and their 96 friends and family cheered as the couple smiled exuberantly.

"And," as Walter Cronkite would certainly have said if he was attending, "That's the way it is."

Having not been invited, all I can say is that they seem like a nice, attractive couple and that I wish them all the happiness they can garner from the world. Life's tough enough on the denizens of the relentlessly advancing world and tougher still without love.

And yet for all that it seems to me that the report of the affair as given here by the oddly named "Devan Sipher" in the 'paper of the broken record' is trying too hard to retain a deadpan affect; a state in which the writing does not "dumb it down" so much as it "blands it out." The tone may be a spin-off of drawing this duty, but Sipher's report of love amongst the ruins is more revealing of how things stand in the floating world of our hallucinating elite than a dozen "scientific" surveys of contemporary human happiness. More than that it tells us how love is done in the high towers of technoworld.

First we have the electronic introduction by the strangely accredited "New York State deputy attorney general in the social justice division." I mean, who knew that the State of New York was so deeply committed not to mere justice but to "social justice" that it would have a division to handle same? I suppose it comes in handy for those litigants or victims who, having lost their battle for plain justice, can appeal for "social justice" which presumably has its own body of separate but equal laws.

And it is, as noted, an "electronic" introduction in which souls destined for kismet but distant in space can hope to span the great divide of fly-over states that unfairly keep New York and California apart. One of the advantages of such an introduction is that it allows intellectuals to mainline each other's thoughts before the more mundane and inconsequential elements of looks and mannerisms can interfere with getting on the brainwave -- an essential credential of love today. Having the whole of the mind before the body interferes is essential if small hiccups in perfection are to be overcome:

“Kay had everything on my list,” Ms. Adamick said, “except she was a vegetarian.” When Ms. Diaz disclosed this particular trait, Ms. Adamick wrote her, “I love animals. Medium rare.”
Let me not have hamburgers and ribs to the marriage of true minds breed impediment.

This mainlining of each other's thoughts used to work better in pure ascii form when email was in the stone age and no photos could be attached. Now, however, photos can be attached and doing so is a sign that modern love is ready to be taken to the next level. It must be love "that looks on tempests and is never shaken." In this case, the sweetness of exchanging photos on Valentine's Day is especially endearing.

But love is not forever to be confined to cyber-realms to be real, but must sooner or later descend from these spiritual planes into the world where it must become "the star to every wandering bark." It begins today with phone coversations that become so intense cell-phone batteries are burnt to cinders --

“We’re both ranters,” Ms. Adamick said of their three-hour marathons that ran the gamut from political prognostications to romantic reveries. [I'm giving extra purple-prose points to Devan Sipher for minting the code-phrase "romantic reveries."]
-- and must ultimately come down to Earth even if that Earth is Newark.

From town car make-out sessions to the final ceremony, our modern love affair does not miss a chance to make history glisten. First comes the mundane out-of-state legalistic wedding in Connecticut exchanging "yellow pipe-cleaner rings," and then the high-toned public ceremony replete with the "engraved gold bands" when it counts in the "event space" in a 19th-century New York town house.

And at the last the little touch of cock-the-snoot sprinkled on the whole thing when the male yenta of the "social justice division" whipped out a little "social justice" of his own with his killer punch-line, “You may both kiss the bride.”

and their 96 friends and family cheered as the couple smiled exuberantly.
"Exuberantly..." Such a weak and wet adverb to such a strong and determined tale of love in 2009, a century trying to make all that was old new; a century trying to remain impervious to history with every ounce of hope it can muster. We've been here before throughout the Clinton years and into the first three quarters of 2001 before it all went smash. Maybe this time our luck will hold even though all of history tells us we are merely whistling through the graveyard.

It is pleasing to hear the rising hymns of hope and change, even though we all know that they only serve to drown out the approaching waves of blood that will determine the fates of many millions; New York dwellers such as Kate and Kay chief among them in their target city. On the other hand, since nothing is written, perhaps it will be their brave new world that survives after all. I, for one, certainly hope so. I'd like a world in which their love and all love begun this week survives at least to the silver anniversary. I just wish I had more hope for this change.

Failing that, I still stand with the bard who notes that , "Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks, / But bears it out even to the edge of doom."

If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.

Posted by Vanderleun at June 1, 2009 1:04 PM | TrackBack
Bookmark and Share

Comments:

HOME

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

You'd be shocked by all the jobs the electeds have created here in NY in the name of all that is good and pure.

Posted by: Matt at June 1, 2009 6:41 PM

We know when love is really love because it endures. It changes and grows and adapts to the briars and brambles around it, but "as he loved us, we love one another."

I've always been so thankful I don't personally have to decide about gay marriage; I'm absolutely against diluting the man-woman, father-mother family ideal, but I also think we should recognize and reward committment and fidelity wherever we find it.

A pity that my mind looks to be made up for me by activist judges instead of my fellow citizens. Americans may be sheeple, but they're my sheeple and I'd prefer to do what they chose instead of what we all have forced on us.

Let's focus on the bright side. A love affair like the one Gerard describes is sure to include lots of smokin' hot, more-or-less monogamous sex, and that's a good thing no matter how arugula-overdosed the participants may be.

Posted by: askmom at June 1, 2009 8:41 PM

Hi, I'm Deputy Attorney General, Division for Social Justice.
My friend has a small business in California. She had a visit yesterday from an agent of the Board of Equalization. She later called me, trembling, to ask what that actually was. She was wise not to ask him.
I told her to ask Winston Smith.

Posted by: at June 2, 2009 8:55 AM

The tone of your article plays into the hands of those who would make the marginal mainstream and the mainstream marginal. These people have lost their humanity and you seem to condemn them and give them your blessings at the same time. I don't think ambivalence towards evil is the right approach.

Posted by: John Hinds at June 2, 2009 10:23 AM

Perhaps. But is the tone that ambivalent? Seems to me it is elsewhere and elsewhen.

Posted by: vanderleun at June 2, 2009 10:28 AM

Was in a hair salon this spring with my teenage daughter, thumbing through BRIDE magazine looking for updo ideas for her prom hairdo. The middle of the magazine contains a photo section of recently married couples at their weddings, showing brides-to-be how everything in the mag ties together on the big day. In amongst the two dozen or so bride/groom couples was one groom/groom couple, a much smaller photo than the others but there nonetheless. I'm with you on the subject of love, it's better to go through life with it than without it, but do two men really qualify as brides in BRIDE magazine?

Posted by: Boots at June 2, 2009 2:43 PM
Post a comment:

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated to combat spam and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.










Remember personal info?