July 25, 2012

Marks of Cain

Mark%20of%20the%20beast-detail%2081.jpg

Quirky, quick/unquick and randomly punctuated, but stay with it. At NeoNeoCon, this comment from one Artfldgr to a thread entitled Romney: the authentically nice politician?

The better man he appears to be the more their faults are seen.

Kind of like putting Helen Thomas next to Michelle Malkin…

In fact, this is actually the Left's hate of white males… after all, outside the constant litany of evil whitie etc… you have the example of the creators of modern civilization, the industrial revolution, the enlightenment, and end to slavery in their own sphere (while it still rages elsewhere), chivalry, the invention of written law, modern law, sea law, international law, international business, and on and on and on.

Romney not playing the proper part, ends up being traditional, strong, handsome, winning, nice, etc.

Anyone ever read Qayin and Havel?

Ever hear Obama mention my brother's keeper?

The Left is always trying to do “good things” for others with a hidden ulterior motive they pretend is never there, but is never absent.

They are never sincere

They are socially capitalistic, not economically. That is, they want to wheel and deal favors among plotters not merit among men.

And so, the socialists, the feminists, the communists, the progressives, the nazis, the maoists, etc.

All need scapegoats.

And they ALL select scapegoats that are better than they are, that they cant defeat in open fair competition.

They select the people they represent by their gullibility, moldibility, ignorance, ability to be bought, and negative qualities. while falsely praising them as to their better qualities.

If the Left represents you, you should be insulted, not happy

But ultimately, they all conjure up Moriarty. the infallible Holmes had Moriarty, the one thing that could defeat him and is worthy his opposition.

Well, the Left is forever calling up the same ghost under a different name to scapegoat. Moriarty, patriarchy, white men, Jews, etc.

But ultimately its the Cain and Able story…
(the other terms are Judaic)

Able works hard and his merit and sacrifice are rewarded as they are sincere, full of merit

But the Left. Cain, hates that when he tries to do good, it comes out bad because he seeks reward not doing good.

Able would do good without reward

Cain would not

Shall i point out that all mankind is descendent from Cain, as Able had a problem with his brother.

The Lord had regard for Abel and his offering, but He did not have regard for Cain and his offering. Cain was furious, and he was downcast.

The Lord. Reality.. as today.. blesses some, and not others. in this case, reality blesses the conservatives and hard working and so the Lord and Reality are one.. and the missives of the bible confer success…

But Cain, doing the same surface cargo cult acts with no substance, can't see why what he does is not worthy of Reality's blessing.

Then the LORD said to Cain, “Why are you furious? And why are you downcast? If you do right, won’t you be accepted? But if you do not do right, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, but you must master it.”
Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let’s go out to the field.” And while they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.

And so… the Left seeks to kill the offenders who are good, full of merit and through hard work gain the blessings of reality (God), because they work in line with reality and do not fight it (lao tsu / dao).

i can relate it to a dozen religions and lessons, but unless Joseph Campbell is resurrected for the conversation, most would be lost with my other examples.

Another variant of this same story is when a group of brothers sell their own into slavery.

The prodigal son is also another similar lesson, as the return of the son marks the mastery of the sins, and a return to what's important to reality.

But you can tell its Cain and Able because of Obama’s quotes on my brothers keeper.

“I hear politicians talking about values in an election year. I hear a lot about that. Let me tell you about values,” Obama said. “Hard work, personal responsibility — those are values. But looking out for one another. That’s a value. The idea that we’re all in this together. I am my brother’s keeper. I am my sister’s keeper. That’s a value.”

But Obama forgets who says this and to whom. And the negative in the bible always follows the Left neurolinguistic form… from Genesis and the snake, onwards.

The form of answering a question with a question… and leading the other to an answer without saying it, etc.

The form is first done by the serpent.

But Obama playing Cain, takes up Cain's response and fixes it, hoping this time, reward will be unlocked.

Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?” “I know not,” he replied. “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

A lie followed by an answering question…

Cain jealously destroys ability in others, murders them, then pretends that the responsible are not responsible as such acts do not cause guilt which would perhaps hint that one should not get that reward.

Then He said, “What have you done? Your brother’s blood cries out to Me from the ground! So now you are cursed [with alienation] from the ground that opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood you have shed. If you work the land, it will never again give you its yield. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth.”

And so, that method that Cain acts by, bears no fruit. Its socialism…

Cain wanted to share equally in the blessings of reality, but was not willing to do what reality wants to gain them. so Cain takes cargo cult shortcuts, thinks he is more clever than reality, and so, as long as Cain is Cain, Cain fails.

Down deep this is the hatred of the Left for Romney… to them, his merit and such is evil, and isn't a big deal. so they don't see his reward in money, good life, many children (more than obama), and so on, as earned.

Just as Cain could not see how able earned reward from reality (god).

And just as Cain, the Left thinks if they genocide the problem, it will go away, and in the absence of it, they then can have the merit.

But Reality's merit is for those who act in accordance with the wishes/principals of reality

At that point Romney ceases to be a person for them, and instead becomes an almost religious symbol of what they want but can't have given their choice of methods negates the desire.

And Cain lived in fear of other men (?), who have not been yet… and feared they would take retribution on him… so God, marked him and blessed him.

The good people will not kill Cain (for they are good), and so Cain is reborn to visit ill over and over on the good people.

Cursed to wander, he destroys any home he settles in, and is forced to leave, as any socialist leader eventually angers their people so much they would kill them as Cain claimed when they found out his real nature.

Posted by gerardvanderleun at July 25, 2012 7:56 AM
Bookmark and Share

Comments:

HOME

"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.

"I am my brother’s keeper. I am my sister’s keeper."

Animals in zoos have keepers.

Posted by: pst314 at July 25, 2012 9:45 AM

It's sort of like an outline for an essay that would be very enjoyable to read. I think whoever wrote that ought to go back and expand on some of those single sentences. Maybe fiddle with the style a little bit, while he's at it.

Posted by: Mike James at July 25, 2012 10:18 AM

The Left is 'Too clever by half'.

You can't trick reality. Or The Lord.

Posted by: Cond0011 at July 25, 2012 10:21 AM

Oh, Gerald! I usually don't read his comments because they're too long, but he gets it, he really gets it! (And you also "get it" by the addition of that graphic.)

The "Mark of Cain", when you look a bit further, can well be interpreted as Man Gone Terribly Wrong. According to the Jewish Zohar (Kabballah), the sign God put on Cain was one of the letters of the Hebrew alphabet. English Rabbi Michael Berg suggests in his interpretation that the Hebrew letter in question is waw or vov. Equivalents in Greek, F and Y; in Latin, F, U, V, W, and Y. The numerical value of WAW in the Gematria is (get this)... 6.

In the Greek Alphabet, there is one letter that is only used at the end of a word when needed - vau, also named Stigma. When Stigma is used as a number, its value is... 6.

In other words, the first human with a Stigma attached to him was none else than Cain.

In the sixth day God created man. On Noah's sixth-hundredth year the Flood came and destroyed all flesh. And of course, Revelation identifies the Beast of Ch. 13 as having a name with its numeric value of six-hundred and sixty-six. Revelations also says every person with that mark will have the full curse of God. (I did my calculations already. Obama is NOT IT, even though he seems to want that position very badly.)

So, the Mark of Cain can be seen as a "serious Stigma attached" of rebellion against God and the rules of Life and Nature, a sign for all people not to relate in any way to this person, for your lives and fortunes will be forfeit. Likewise, Socialism and Communism (as well as Marx and Engels) must, MUST have that same WAW, the same STIGMA attached to it and them, so that no one's lives, freedom or property become forfeit because of it.

From my conversations with people from Eastern Europe that I have met over the years, I can see they don't like Communism in any way. Many decades of experience for them have been enough to sour them out of it. Russians have had over seventy years experience dealing with Communism. They can smell one from a mile away - and tell others to run, don't walk, away from it. They can teach us a lot about how to spot a Marxist.

Posted by: newton at July 25, 2012 12:17 PM

Artfldgr writes comments on neoneocon.com, always in the same manner. Brilliant points, cogent references and quotes, and partial sentences to establish the framework.

He doesn’t write essays. His brilliance is like a torch in a reconnaissance mission in the Leftist (Collectivist) enemy territory. It shines here and there, picking up salient issues and detailing an important segment of the enemy’s armaments and encampment. His comments are long, but I always find them more than worth my time to read them: a few minutes spent thusly will help me in my personal battle against the enormity of the enemy we face and the shadowed cast of the future they mean to force on us.

He presents his reconnaissance report in quick battlefield snapshot-paragraphs. It’s up to the reader to go to the cited resources, flesh out the information, do some thinking, and derive his own individual strategy and tactics from his expedition for the Culture War we are fighting.

I think Artfldgr is one of the best of God’s spies.

Posted by: Minta Marie Morze at July 25, 2012 12:31 PM

First time I had seen his stuff, but it's like poetry via telegraph.

Posted by: mushroom at July 25, 2012 2:19 PM

Great literature it ain't. Commentary full of insight. Yep!

Posted by: Jimmy J. at July 25, 2012 7:34 PM

Gerard, while your post may not be divinely inspired, it is nevertheless genius. Thank you for baring so much ... it is not in vain.

Posted by: edaddy at July 25, 2012 8:13 PM

You notice God never says "yes, you are your brother's keeper." That's because GOD is your brother's keeper.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at July 26, 2012 11:07 AM

Sometimes, when things all seem right with the world and the days are one long vacation from history and reality, scriptures are just don't make sense, and then one day, you're reading John 12, and suddenly, you feel like you've just watched a political ad:

John 12

1 Then Jesus six days before the passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was, which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.

2 There they made him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him.

3 Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.

4 Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, which should betray him,

5 Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?

6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.

7 Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this.

8 For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always.

The false and lying compassionate politicians do the very same, they say the very same things. Always concerned with what we do with our own money and oh, so worried about the poor. I used to read it that the poor would always be with us, but now, when I read this, I read, "They lie who say they care about the poor. The thieves and liars you will have with you always."

Posted by: Jewel at July 27, 2012 7:38 PM

All mankind descended from Cain? Not even approximately true, even if one takes the Bible as inerrant. (Which I don't, BTW.)

From the King James Bible (5:3-8):

"3: And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:
4: And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
5: And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.
6: And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:
7: And Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters:
8: And all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years: and he died."

Posted by: Fletcher Christian at July 29, 2012 1:28 PM