He can see the obvious re: Obama. But his "what do do if Obama enacts amnesty" would ensure a 1-party state in America.

“The people in power will not disappear voluntarily.”

"There is simply no room left for 'freedom from the tyranny of government' since city dwellers depend on it for food, power, water, transportation, protection, and welfare.

"Your right to live where you want, with companions of your choosing, under laws to which you agree, died in the eighteenth century ...

Only a miracle or a disaster could restore it." W. S. Burroughs

Don't come in with a new vision of what you think the USA should look like, don't think to impose another new template for us all to live under.
Just remove the burdensome, wasteful and redundant laws, agencies, oversight that we are bludgeoned by every moment of every day. The chains on our dreams, chains that we have to pay for. Get rid of all that and then step out of the way and watch the productive and imagination people of this nation create a new prosperity, one that exists outside of Wall Street.

(Just a thought, but good place to start is to take every living soul that works for the EPA, IRS, TSA and NLR out and put a bullet in their heads.)

John is correct, though most people won't accept that, especially the votists. For unexplainable reasons they are comfortable with their chains though they don't mind begging for a little comfort every now and then.

Bullets are the freedomists salvation and nothing less will do, though a razor sharp blade might come in handy for disembowelment purposes.

Ya see, it ain't the politicians that's the problem, it's the people that enable them. They's the enemy. Without votists there are no politicians.

Remember the image of him kicking the door? Gosh, that was great. The fascinating/terrifying thing is that so little is known about this individual, still. Trying to remember back to all the previous presidents, and how much press coverage that they, their families, etc. received. This guy, still shrouded in mystery.

It's better to have a Krauthammer than not! It's taken him 5-6 years thought to finally see that Obama is not friend but foe. It doesn't take a shrink to understand Obama. Professionally, I have been a shrink as well, but it wasn't my education that yielded the "heads-up" on Obama. It was being brave enough to get the PC crap out of your brain, just as millions of others have suitably done. Obama wants more than notoriety. He wants to command the world, and he's doing it through managing the crises he and his ilk are creating. I would submit, this has been planned by Obama et al. Nothing "stupid" about it. His sights are on being the saviour to Muslims and the Middle East, the portended Muslim Immam. That's what has guided his behaviour in the Middle East: Create Crisis through division and then conquer. Unfortunately, most others believe this hypothesis is just too far of stretch. But this is what results when you simply connect all the dots regarding Obama's behaviour. It's the natural outcome.... It's the only explanation that truly fits....

"Ghostsniper" is absolutely correct. Take down just a handful of enablers and the rest will crawl back into the cracks and ratholes they came from. It doesn't take but a few bullet riddled, yet acceptable losses and the very basic instinct of survival will kick in.

Then remain vigilant, because they will creep out of their lairs from time to time to test the intelligence of the people.

Some folks knew all about Obama before he was in office:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html

I have so much respect for Krauthammer's insights. Thamks, Gerard, for highlighting this one. I hope McConnell is listening, and b1tchslaps that crybaby Boehner into a commitment.

That's how this Ferguson situation could be handled as well. One might pre-position snipers (not cops, private contractors -- the Bundy Ranch type) on rooftops and hides near the most likely trouble spots. Supply each with photos of known ringleaders. Then, when the festivities start, just begin taking them out.

This is just guesswork, of course. I know nothing about infantry tactics or sniping (Navy veteran), but I'd be willing to bet that a few rounds whipping out of the black night into a few rioters' heads would take the fight out of even the toughest-talking Urban Street Fighter.

I know it sounds brutal, and doing this would probably be illegal as well, but doesn't it make sense to kill a dozen or so actively-evil Bad Guys up front instead of having to kill a whole lot of followers, dupes, hangers-on, and stupid kids looking for some action?

God help us. I can't believe we've come to this.

Elsewhere (*) I commented that all it would take is 4-to-6 instances of trying some of our duly-elected Congress-weasels for violating their oaths of office/ malfeasance/ treason/ trading favors with taxpayer money/ (I'm sure there are more offenses we could come up with), then executing them.

The other several-hundred political hacks who claim they're "committed to serving the public" would suddenly realize that being a Representative Of The People is SERIOUS business; and they would --out of sheer survival instinct-- start acting in OUR interests.

Some things I'd like to see our "public servants" finally get around to: secure the borders; enforce Ebola quarantines; repatriate illegals; prosecute the Big Banks for their egregious financial crimes {tell me again- why is John Corzine still a free man? or Jamie Dimon?}; and -dammit- take back control of all those regulatory agencies that our Beltway Betters set up as "autonomous bodies" *specifically* to avoid being held responsible for the unpopular regulations such agencies create and enforce.

(*) I believe I was accused of being a bloodthirsty savage or some such. But... what other way can We-The-People keep our Elite Ruling Class in check??? Holding an election and tossing out the worst-of-the-worst every 2, 4, or 6 years is NOT working well. IMHO.