There is a reason the fraud must continue--until it can be replaced with a fresher fraud. 29 Billion reasons, and the fraud will be defended as if it were an inheritance, which it now is for many thousands.

"I am against nature. I don't dig nature at all." Bob Dylan.

Why, just the other day, I was in Florida on vacation, and I heard that noted scientist and atmospheric expert Garry Trudeau expounding that the Florida coastline had already been profoundly changed by Global Warming.
Hint: If the ice packs on both poles actually melted, the change in sea level would not be very great, because the melted cold water would actually be denser than frozen ice, and ninety per cent of pack ice in the North Pole is already below water.

"the Florida coastline had already been profoundly changed by Global Warming"

======================

I wonder why very wealthy people hired me to design THREE multimillion dollar homes right directly on the coast of southweat Florida so far this year? I'll probably do 6-7 more before the year is over.

Now why in the world would people do that on an eroding coastline?

I was asked to sit down (last Wed.) when pointing out to DTE officials why their plans for wind turbines in Huron Co. Mich. had nothing to do with global warming. They already have 325 and are adding 70 more, all 2/3 payed for with Fed. subsidies, giant scam.

You'll know the science is settled when celebrities in Malibu are dumping their beachfront estates at fire sale prices.

I used a similar example the other day when debating about conservatives being called scaremongers. I was then accused of being a denier. I ended with, "How can I be expected to agree with the science when the science can't even agree with itself?"