Michael Duff gets down to the heart of the Blogsphere vs. Major Media grudgematch in The Roots of the Problem. Some choice excerpts, but the whole essay is prime.
[I]f there is any justice in the world, it will lead to the collapse of the CBS news division, and the contrite resignation of Dan Rather. But there is no justice in the world, so events will unfold pretty much as the Belmont guys have predicted.Posted by Vanderleun at September 11, 2004 9:01 AM | TrackBack
Dapper Dan will retire with dignity in a few years, and this story will be the province of "right-wing nutjobs" who wonder why they don't have press credentials yet.
I am skeptical about the influence of the blogosphere on mainstream media, not because I doubt the skills or the integrity of my colleagues (far from it!), but because I think we're in a cultural battle that we can't win.
I'm saying that even if we're right, we lose, because we're up against a guild system that has existed since the 30s....At the same time FDR was drugging the country with diluted injections of Marxism, the culture of media was changing. What was once the province of fast-talking working-class dogs became a profession for degreed professionals.
Somewhere in the past seventy years, journalism went from being a vocation and turned into a profession. Today, that transformation is complete. Journalists are the newest members of the elite, achieving parity with doctors, lawyers, celebrities, and politicians. (Once you land a job with the right paper.)....You think people go to j-school because they want to spend fifty years writing dry, objective news reports? Hell, no! That's intern work! They want to get in the ring and earn themselves a column. They want to shape the national debate.
They believe in the power of words. They believe in the power of thought. And just like the Democratic Party, they believe that words are enough to change reality. The right words in the right ears at the right time can inflate stock markets and bring down governments, because over time, we steered away from a system based on work and metal, and turned it into a system based on authority and words....Journalists learned that they could change the world by influencing the actions of people in government. Today they exercise that power by controlling the reputations of people they write about.
I'm saying that journalists favor the centralization of power because it dramatically increases their influence. Once we get health care, retirement benefits, and education firmly in the hands of the government, journalists will be able to exercise tremendous influence over those systems, simply by writing for and against the people in charge....
Wow! Thanks for linking this. I knew what I was trying to say, but I wasn't expecting anybody else to get it.
Posted by: Michael Duff at September 11, 2004 12:07 PMNow that they've admitted they don't even have the originals, they'll never apologize, but it doesn't matter. The smear has backfired, & it's Rather whose hands are dirty.
Posted by: jeff at September 11, 2004 1:16 PMThe mere existence of talk radio and the blogsphere demonstrates the error of your conclusions. As the traditional media divorces itself from "facts just the facts" to persue the agenda of various annointed causes its influence declines along with its power. Why is it journalists enjoy the same prestige and credibility as lawyers? Or am I insulting lawyers?
Posted by: Thomas J. Jackson at September 11, 2004 5:54 PMHelp us fight injustice in Iran. Please sign our petition opposing the death penalty for minors.
http://www.petitiononline.com/coceii/petition.html
Posted by: zaneirani at September 12, 2004 7:38 AMWe have now several generations now of self-annointed crusaders who chose journalism for their college degree program after watching Redford and Hoffman in “All the President’s Men.” Combined with the Radical-Left domination of American university faculties, this has produced a tide of counter-cultural primitives steeped since toilet training with the notion that the purpose of journalism is to topple Republican/Fascist presidents. The collection and correlation of facts are only important insofar as they can be used to support the underlying agenda--- Resistance to the oppression of the Conservatives. Inconvenient facts or allegations are to be dismissed, belittled, scorned, and characterized as lacking credibility.
Posted by: David March, animator & fiddler at September 18, 2004 12:17 AM"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper N.B.: Comments are moderated to combat spam and may not appear immediately. Comments that exceed the obscenity or stupidity limits will be either edited or expunged.