“If you think it can’t get worse than transexuals or pedophiles, you’re really not understanding how this works. Look at this NYT article: a black woman, ex-con, convicted of murdering her own 4 year old son. She served 20 years of prison, which she spent studying sociology or something. After leaving prison, she applied to study a PhD at Harvard, which rejected her. Progressives were on arms. How could you!
“Go to the link, and look at that woman. Look at that face. She never expressed any remorse over killing her children. She lied about it in the PhD application. She disposed of the body and never told the cops where her son’s corpse is! This is utter and complete psycho. Nobody on it’s right mind would want anything to do with this woman. But that’s precisely the point. In most human societies before 1900 she would have been killed, legally or extralegally. But precisely this kind of person, what should in all justice be the lowest status person on earth; that’s exactly the people that the Left wants on its team. You can count on her extreme loyalty to any progressive idea that the party transmits to her. And so, yes, of course, she finally got her PhD, at New York University. And unlike 97% of PhD students out there, you can bet on her getting a full tenured professorship very soon.
“Yes, it’s all madness, but it works. It really works like a charm. The richest parts of America, California and New York, are now a one-party state. America has legislation which forces every private enterprise of size to have a proportion of women, of black people and sexual deviants; which of course know they don’t belong there, and thus are extremely faithful political commissars. More faithful than the actual official political commissars that Communist China has also in their private companies.
“There’s a reason why there’s so many evil fat women in government. Where else would they be if government didn’t want them? They have nothing going on for them, except their membership in the Democratic party machine. The party gives them all they have; the same way the Communist party had given everything to that average peasant kid who became a middling bureaucrat in Moscow. And don’t even get me started with hostile Muslims or Transexuals. Those people used to be expelled or taken into asylums, pre-1960. Which is why American Progressivism likes them so much. The little these people have depends completely on the Left’s patronage. There’s a devil’s bargain there: the more naturally repulsive someone else, the more valuable it is as a party member, as its loyalty will be all the stronger. This is of course what’s behind Larry Auster’s First Law of minority relations: the worse a group behaves, the more the Left likes it…..”
Gerard Van der Leun
Comments on this entry are closed.
I have tried to comprehend why democrats want this malevolent collection of seething, hate-filled, implacable, flaming assholes. Sure, once the revolution succeeds they’re going to need neighborhood commissars and snitches, but surely not in the numbers these miscreants will provide. Moreover, because they cannot, under any circumstances be appeased, they will go on being vexatious and noisome to the new overlords. Same as it ever was.
The only satisfactory conclusion that I’ve been able to discern is that once this latest incarnation of Useful Idiots ceases to be useful, they will simply be eradicated. Communism is replete with this. I’ve no doubt that should the so-called progressive left ultimately prevail, TPTB will show no compunction in destroying the cancer these individuals present.
Of course, Richard. Too bad they don’t know that.
My great aunt six or seven generations past was hanged on the Boston Common by Cotton Mather. She had it coming too, killing her twins. Just one or two more hangings and my family would have been doing great, but alas they slipped the noose and procreated much. They say you can’t choose your relatives but my great aunt certainly did.
Off with her nutz!
Thank you Gerard, that was great, the best explanation I’ve seen about the falling apart of society. I’m going to make a terrible bore of myself repeating the ideas in that essay. Reposted it on GAB.
An oz. of plastic explosive implanted just behind the ear, its the only way to be sure.
Off with her nutz..
The left can rot from within their center and implode. Civil society has not prominent use for those bent in the brain. Off with her nutz!
A long worthwhile read!
It seems to boil down to greed. The unworthy, the serfs, trade their votes, their support, their loyalty to the ruler who then provides them with the otherwise unearned necessities of life.
The ruler’s greed is for more power to better ensure his wealth and safety and egomania.
The ruler creates opposing devilish factions and teaches the serfs that these factions are the reason that serf life is not better than it is.
The Freemen cohort is constantly eroded by the education system established by the ruler and maintained by the corrupted legal system and cowardly, self-serving serf administrators.
Until the Freemen wake up, organize, and oppose the ruler’s thiefdom threat to freedom, the erosion will continue.
As was well known at our founding, the tree of liberty must occasionally, of necessity, be watered with the blood of tyrants and Freemen.
Let’s start with the principles, resistance, persistance of our founding patriots, Freemen all.
“…be watered with the blood of tyrants and Freemen.
Let’s start with the principles…”
======================
You mean principles like, personal property?
As in, the very tools that provide the means for watering the tree?
You know, the tools you want to limit (in a previous post).
I think you’re about 80% there, Howard, but you still have a ways to go.
My guess is that you have not been sufficiently raped by the gov’t yet so as to see it as it really is, and still believe it has value. My story is the opposite and I believe the gov’t has enormous negative value. Yes, it’s cost in total absolutely dwarfs it’s cost in legal tenders.
gs, my comments on the gun thread were aimed at detecting criminal psychotics before they could buy new or used guns. When doctors prescribe medications that may cause violent behavior as a side effect, how do they know whether or not their client has a handgun, rifle, …
at home? Could the Columbine or Sandy Hook massacres been prevented
When buying a gun does the seller ask the client if their med is on the ‘dangerous’ list, or if anyone in their household is prescribed such a med? If so, how is the truthfulness of the reply determined? If untruthful, what should happen next? How should an incongruous reply be interpreted? Analogously, what tests/questioning does a CIA candidate undergo to assess truthfulness of reply? How can their procedure be adapted to weed out psychotic gun purchasers?
I realize this kind of procedure is annoying. What’s an occasional schoolroom filled with children worth?
You are correct in that I’ve not had bad experiences with government, other than being subject to its mismanagement and waste of taxpayer payments.
“What’s an occasional schoolroom filled with children worth?”
==============================
Focus Howard, focus.
Children should not be “compulsed” to be in those human shooting galleries in the first place.
BTW, have you noticed criminals inherently don’t obey laws, but just go ahead and keep wanting the gov’t criminals to enact more of them.
To help you get up to speed, Howard, I suggest you look up Lysander Spooner and consume all you find.